Quoting Lina Iyer (2018-03-02 08:43:17)
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> index e9f5a1f387fd..d9cfa7aaf49c 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> @@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ static struct tcs_group *get_tcs_for_msg(struct
Quoting Lina Iyer (2018-03-02 08:43:17)
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> index e9f5a1f387fd..d9cfa7aaf49c 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> @@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ static struct tcs_group *get_tcs_for_msg(struct
Some RSCs may only have sleep and wake TCS, i.e, there is no dedicated
TCS for active mode request, but drivers may still want to make active
requests from these RSCs. In such cases re-purpose the wake TCS to send
active state requests.
The requirement for this is that the driver is aware that
Some RSCs may only have sleep and wake TCS, i.e, there is no dedicated
TCS for active mode request, but drivers may still want to make active
requests from these RSCs. In such cases re-purpose the wake TCS to send
active state requests.
The requirement for this is that the driver is aware that
4 matches
Mail list logo
