[PATCH v3 15/18] x86/tsc: Use rdtsc_ordered() in check_tsc_warp() and drop extra barriers

2015-06-16 Thread Andy Lutomirski
Using get_cycles was unnecessary: check_tsc_warp() is not called on
TSC-less systems.  Replace rdtsc_barrier(); get_cycles() with
rdtsc_ordered().

While we're at it, make the somewhat more dangerous change of
removing barrier_before_rdtsc after RDTSC in the TSC warp check
code.  This should be okay, though -- the vDSO TSC code doesn't have
that barrier, so, if removing the barrier from the warp check would
cause us to detect a warp that we otherwise wouldn't detect, then we
have a genuine bug.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski 
---
 arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c | 14 ++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c
index dd8d0791dfb5..78083bf23ed1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c
@@ -39,16 +39,15 @@ static cycles_t max_warp;
 static int nr_warps;
 
 /*
- * TSC-warp measurement loop running on both CPUs:
+ * TSC-warp measurement loop running on both CPUs.  This is not called
+ * if there is no TSC.
  */
 static void check_tsc_warp(unsigned int timeout)
 {
cycles_t start, now, prev, end;
int i;
 
-   rdtsc_barrier();
-   start = get_cycles();
-   rdtsc_barrier();
+   start = rdtsc_ordered();
/*
 * The measurement runs for 'timeout' msecs:
 */
@@ -63,9 +62,7 @@ static void check_tsc_warp(unsigned int timeout)
 */
arch_spin_lock(_lock);
prev = last_tsc;
-   rdtsc_barrier();
-   now = get_cycles();
-   rdtsc_barrier();
+   now = rdtsc_ordered();
last_tsc = now;
arch_spin_unlock(_lock);
 
@@ -126,7 +123,7 @@ void check_tsc_sync_source(int cpu)
 
/*
 * No need to check if we already know that the TSC is not
-* synchronized:
+* synchronized or if we have no TSC.
 */
if (unsynchronized_tsc())
return;
@@ -190,6 +187,7 @@ void check_tsc_sync_target(void)
 {
int cpus = 2;
 
+   /* Also aborts if there is no TSC. */
if (unsynchronized_tsc() || tsc_clocksource_reliable)
return;
 
-- 
2.4.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH v3 15/18] x86/tsc: Use rdtsc_ordered() in check_tsc_warp() and drop extra barriers

2015-06-16 Thread Andy Lutomirski
Using get_cycles was unnecessary: check_tsc_warp() is not called on
TSC-less systems.  Replace rdtsc_barrier(); get_cycles() with
rdtsc_ordered().

While we're at it, make the somewhat more dangerous change of
removing barrier_before_rdtsc after RDTSC in the TSC warp check
code.  This should be okay, though -- the vDSO TSC code doesn't have
that barrier, so, if removing the barrier from the warp check would
cause us to detect a warp that we otherwise wouldn't detect, then we
have a genuine bug.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski l...@kernel.org
---
 arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c | 14 ++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c
index dd8d0791dfb5..78083bf23ed1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c
@@ -39,16 +39,15 @@ static cycles_t max_warp;
 static int nr_warps;
 
 /*
- * TSC-warp measurement loop running on both CPUs:
+ * TSC-warp measurement loop running on both CPUs.  This is not called
+ * if there is no TSC.
  */
 static void check_tsc_warp(unsigned int timeout)
 {
cycles_t start, now, prev, end;
int i;
 
-   rdtsc_barrier();
-   start = get_cycles();
-   rdtsc_barrier();
+   start = rdtsc_ordered();
/*
 * The measurement runs for 'timeout' msecs:
 */
@@ -63,9 +62,7 @@ static void check_tsc_warp(unsigned int timeout)
 */
arch_spin_lock(sync_lock);
prev = last_tsc;
-   rdtsc_barrier();
-   now = get_cycles();
-   rdtsc_barrier();
+   now = rdtsc_ordered();
last_tsc = now;
arch_spin_unlock(sync_lock);
 
@@ -126,7 +123,7 @@ void check_tsc_sync_source(int cpu)
 
/*
 * No need to check if we already know that the TSC is not
-* synchronized:
+* synchronized or if we have no TSC.
 */
if (unsynchronized_tsc())
return;
@@ -190,6 +187,7 @@ void check_tsc_sync_target(void)
 {
int cpus = 2;
 
+   /* Also aborts if there is no TSC. */
if (unsynchronized_tsc() || tsc_clocksource_reliable)
return;
 
-- 
2.4.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/