Thank you Brendan for reviewing,
On Wednesday 01 March 2017 10:34 AM, Brendan Gregg wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Brendan Gregg
> wrote:
>> G'Day Ravi,
>>
> [...]
>> Now retrying perf:
>>
>> # ./perf record -e sdt_node:http__server__request -a
>> ^C[ perf
Thank you Brendan for reviewing,
On Wednesday 01 March 2017 10:34 AM, Brendan Gregg wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Brendan Gregg
> wrote:
>> G'Day Ravi,
>>
> [...]
>> Now retrying perf:
>>
>> # ./perf record -e sdt_node:http__server__request -a
>> ^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Brendan Gregg
wrote:
> G'Day Ravi,
>
[...]
> Now retrying perf:
>
> # ./perf record -e sdt_node:http__server__request -a
> ^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.446 MB perf.data (3
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Brendan Gregg
wrote:
> G'Day Ravi,
>
[...]
> Now retrying perf:
>
> # ./perf record -e sdt_node:http__server__request -a
> ^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.446 MB perf.data (3 samples) ]
> # ./perf script
>
On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 16:26:19 +0530
Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> Thanks Masami for the review.
> Please find my replies to your comments.
>
> On Tuesday 28 February 2017 11:15 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:13:25 +0530
> > Ravi Bangoria
On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 16:26:19 +0530
Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> Thanks Masami for the review.
> Please find my replies to your comments.
>
> On Tuesday 28 February 2017 11:15 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:13:25 +0530
> > Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> >
> >> After invoking 'perf
G'Day Ravi,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Ravi Bangoria
wrote:
>
> From: Hemant Kumar
>
> Add support for directly recording SDT events which are present in
> the probe cache. Without this patch, we could probe into SDT events
>
G'Day Ravi,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Ravi Bangoria
wrote:
>
> From: Hemant Kumar
>
> Add support for directly recording SDT events which are present in
> the probe cache. Without this patch, we could probe into SDT events
> using 'perf probe' and 'perf record'. With this patch, we can
Thanks Masami for the review.
Please find my replies to your comments.
On Tuesday 28 February 2017 11:15 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:13:25 +0530
> Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>
>> After invoking 'perf record', behind the scenes, it checks
Thanks Masami for the review.
Please find my replies to your comments.
On Tuesday 28 February 2017 11:15 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:13:25 +0530
> Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>
>> After invoking 'perf record', behind the scenes, it checks whether
>> the event specified is an
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:13:25 +0530
Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> From: Hemant Kumar
>
> Add support for directly recording SDT events which are present in
> the probe cache. Without this patch, we could probe into SDT events
> using 'perf
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:13:25 +0530
Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> From: Hemant Kumar
>
> Add support for directly recording SDT events which are present in
> the probe cache. Without this patch, we could probe into SDT events
> using 'perf probe' and 'perf record'. With this patch, we can probe
> the
From: Hemant Kumar
Add support for directly recording SDT events which are present in
the probe cache. Without this patch, we could probe into SDT events
using 'perf probe' and 'perf record'. With this patch, we can probe
the SDT events directly using 'perf record'.
From: Hemant Kumar
Add support for directly recording SDT events which are present in
the probe cache. Without this patch, we could probe into SDT events
using 'perf probe' and 'perf record'. With this patch, we can probe
the SDT events directly using 'perf record'.
For example :
$ perf list
14 matches
Mail list logo