On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> On 01/25/2017 04:32 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
[...]
>>> because genpd_xlate_simple only checks that the phandle is zero so that
>>> it
>>> can
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> On 01/25/2017 04:32 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
[...]
>>> because genpd_xlate_simple only checks that the phandle is zero so that
>>> it
>>> can fail if it is not, but there's no
On 01/25/2017 04:32 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
On 01/24/2017 04:03 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 23 January 2017 at 21:11, Dave Gerlach wrote:
On 01/20/2017 10:52 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
Another
On 01/25/2017 04:32 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
On 01/24/2017 04:03 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 23 January 2017 at 21:11, Dave Gerlach wrote:
On 01/20/2017 10:52 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
Another option is create something new either
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> On 01/24/2017 04:03 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>
>> On 23 January 2017 at 21:11, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/20/2017 10:52 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
>>> Another option is
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> On 01/24/2017 04:03 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>
>> On 23 January 2017 at 21:11, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/20/2017 10:52 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
>>> Another option is create something new either common or
On 25 January 2017 at 17:59, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> On 01/24/2017 04:03 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>
>> On 23 January 2017 at 21:11, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/20/2017 10:52 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
>>> Another option is create
On 25 January 2017 at 17:59, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> On 01/24/2017 04:03 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>
>> On 23 January 2017 at 21:11, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/20/2017 10:52 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
>>> Another option is create something new either common or TI SCI
On 01/24/2017 04:03 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 23 January 2017 at 21:11, Dave Gerlach wrote:
On 01/20/2017 10:52 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
Another option is create something new either common or TI SCI
specific. It could be just a table of ids and phandles in the SCI
On 01/24/2017 04:03 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 23 January 2017 at 21:11, Dave Gerlach wrote:
On 01/20/2017 10:52 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
Another option is create something new either common or TI SCI
specific. It could be just a table of ids and phandles in the SCI
node. I'm much more
On 23 January 2017 at 21:11, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> On 01/20/2017 10:52 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
> Another option is create something new either common or TI SCI
> specific. It could be just a table of ids and phandles in the SCI
> node. I'm much more
On 23 January 2017 at 21:11, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> On 01/20/2017 10:52 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
> Another option is create something new either common or TI SCI
> specific. It could be just a table of ids and phandles in the SCI
> node. I'm much more comfortable with an
On 01/20/2017 10:52 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
Another option is create something new either common or TI SCI
specific. It could be just a table of ids and phandles in the SCI
node. I'm much more comfortable with an isolated property in one node
than something scattered throughout the DT.
On 01/20/2017 10:52 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
Another option is create something new either common or TI SCI
specific. It could be just a table of ids and phandles in the SCI
node. I'm much more comfortable with an isolated property in one node
than something scattered throughout the DT.
[...]
>>> Another option is create something new either common or TI SCI
>>> specific. It could be just a table of ids and phandles in the SCI
>>> node. I'm much more comfortable with an isolated property in one node
>>> than something scattered throughout the DT.
>>
>> To me, this seems like the
[...]
>>> Another option is create something new either common or TI SCI
>>> specific. It could be just a table of ids and phandles in the SCI
>>> node. I'm much more comfortable with an isolated property in one node
>>> than something scattered throughout the DT.
>>
>> To me, this seems like the
On 01/20/2017 08:00 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> + Sudeep
>
> On 19 January 2017 at 00:03, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> Tero Kristo writes:
On 17/01/17 00:12, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> On
On 01/20/2017 08:00 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> + Sudeep
>
> On 19 January 2017 at 00:03, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> Tero Kristo writes:
On 17/01/17 00:12, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> On 01/13/2017 08:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Fri,
On 20/01/17 14:00, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> + Sudeep
>
> On 19 January 2017 at 00:03, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> We could continue to use the power domain binding (maybe we already
>> are and that ship has sailed). I'm not totally against the idea even
>> if there is no power
On 20/01/17 14:00, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> + Sudeep
>
> On 19 January 2017 at 00:03, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> We could continue to use the power domain binding (maybe we already
>> are and that ship has sailed). I'm not totally against the idea even
>> if there is no power domain, but I'm not
+ Sudeep
On 19 January 2017 at 00:03, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Tero Kristo writes:
>>> On 17/01/17 00:12, Dave Gerlach wrote:
On 01/13/2017 08:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On
+ Sudeep
On 19 January 2017 at 00:03, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Tero Kristo writes:
>>> On 17/01/17 00:12, Dave Gerlach wrote:
On 01/13/2017 08:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>
>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Tero Kristo writes:
>> On 17/01/17 00:12, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>>> On 01/13/2017 08:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
[...]
> My
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Tero Kristo writes:
>> On 17/01/17 00:12, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>>> On 01/13/2017 08:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
[...]
> My ti,sci-id is not an index into a list of power domains,
Tero Kristo writes:
> On 17/01/17 00:12, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>> On 01/13/2017 08:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
On 01/13/2017 01:25 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:27 AM,
Tero Kristo writes:
> On 17/01/17 00:12, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>> On 01/13/2017 08:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
On 01/13/2017 01:25 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>>
>>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:48 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 17/01/17 00:12, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>>
>> On 01/13/2017 08:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
On 01/13/2017 01:25 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:48 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 17/01/17 00:12, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>>
>> On 01/13/2017 08:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
On 01/13/2017 01:25 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017
On 17/01/17 00:12, Dave Gerlach wrote:
On 01/13/2017 08:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
On 01/13/2017 01:25 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
Rob,
On 01/11/2017
On 17/01/17 00:12, Dave Gerlach wrote:
On 01/13/2017 08:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
On 01/13/2017 01:25 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
Rob,
On 01/11/2017 03:34 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On
On 01/13/2017 08:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
On 01/13/2017 01:25 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
Rob,
On 01/11/2017 03:34 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon,
On 01/13/2017 08:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
On 01/13/2017 01:25 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
Rob,
On 01/11/2017 03:34 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Dave Gerlach
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> On 01/13/2017 01:25 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>>>
>>> Rob,
>>>
>>> On 01/11/2017 03:34 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> On 01/13/2017 01:25 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>>>
>>> Rob,
>>>
>>> On 01/11/2017 03:34 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>
On 01/13/2017 01:25 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
Rob,
On 01/11/2017 03:34 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
Rob,
On 01/09/2017 11:50 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On
On 01/13/2017 01:25 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
Rob,
On 01/11/2017 03:34 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
Rob,
On 01/09/2017 11:50 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:55:34PM
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> Rob,
>
> On 01/11/2017 03:34 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>>>
>>> Rob,
>>>
>>> On 01/09/2017 11:50 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> Rob,
>
> On 01/11/2017 03:34 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>>>
>>> Rob,
>>>
>>> On 01/09/2017 11:50 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:55:34PM -0600, Dave
Rob,
On 01/11/2017 03:34 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
Rob,
On 01/09/2017 11:50 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:55:34PM -0600, Dave Gerlach wrote:
Add a generic power domain implementation, TI SCI PM
Rob,
On 01/11/2017 03:34 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
Rob,
On 01/09/2017 11:50 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:55:34PM -0600, Dave Gerlach wrote:
Add a generic power domain implementation, TI SCI PM Domains, that
will hook
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> Rob,
>
> On 01/09/2017 11:50 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:55:34PM -0600, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>>>
>>> Add a generic power domain implementation, TI SCI PM Domains, that
>>> will hook into the genpd
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> Rob,
>
> On 01/09/2017 11:50 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:55:34PM -0600, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>>>
>>> Add a generic power domain implementation, TI SCI PM Domains, that
>>> will hook into the genpd framework and
Rob,
On 01/09/2017 11:50 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:55:34PM -0600, Dave Gerlach wrote:
Add a generic power domain implementation, TI SCI PM Domains, that
will hook into the genpd framework and allow the TI SCI protocol to
control device power states.
Also, provide macros
Rob,
On 01/09/2017 11:50 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:55:34PM -0600, Dave Gerlach wrote:
Add a generic power domain implementation, TI SCI PM Domains, that
will hook into the genpd framework and allow the TI SCI protocol to
control device power states.
Also, provide macros
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:55:34PM -0600, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> Add a generic power domain implementation, TI SCI PM Domains, that
> will hook into the genpd framework and allow the TI SCI protocol to
> control device power states.
>
> Also, provide macros representing each device index as
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:55:34PM -0600, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> Add a generic power domain implementation, TI SCI PM Domains, that
> will hook into the genpd framework and allow the TI SCI protocol to
> control device power states.
>
> Also, provide macros representing each device index as
Add a generic power domain implementation, TI SCI PM Domains, that
will hook into the genpd framework and allow the TI SCI protocol to
control device power states.
Also, provide macros representing each device index as understood
by TI SCI to be used in the device node power-domain references.
Add a generic power domain implementation, TI SCI PM Domains, that
will hook into the genpd framework and allow the TI SCI protocol to
control device power states.
Also, provide macros representing each device index as understood
by TI SCI to be used in the device node power-domain references.
48 matches
Mail list logo