On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:02:00AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:42:24PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > Hi Fengguang,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:29:14PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > Hi Boqun,
> > >
> > > The base tree detection is based on the whole patchset's
> > BTW, does this bot have more tests than 0day? I have pushed this
> > patchset to my own repo and had it tested by 0day.
>
> Yes, it runs git am, the resulted commits are feed to 0day for
> build/boot/performance tests. If you've already pushed the patches via
> git, the robot should have skip
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:42:24PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> Hi Fengguang,
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:29:14PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > Hi Boqun,
> >
> > The base tree detection is based on the whole patchset's
> >
> > - subjects
> > - touched files
> > - TO/CC list
> >
> > Log shows
Hi Fengguang,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:29:14PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Boqun,
>
> The base tree detection is based on the whole patchset's
>
> - subjects
> - touched files
> - TO/CC list
>
> Log shows the files and TO/CC are strongly related to powerpc,
> so it looks a natural choice
Hi Boqun,
The base tree detection is based on the whole patchset's
- subjects
- touched files
- TO/CC list
Log shows the files and TO/CC are strongly related to powerpc,
so it looks a natural choice to apply to it. Especially you put
"linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org" in the TO list while
Some atomic operations now have _{relaxed, acquire, release} variants,
this patch then adds some trivial tests for two purpose:
1. test the behavior of these new operations in single-CPU
environment.
2. make their code generated before we actually use them somewhere,
so
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:42:24PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> Hi Fengguang,
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:29:14PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > Hi Boqun,
> >
> > The base tree detection is based on the whole patchset's
> >
> > - subjects
> > - touched files
> > - TO/CC list
> >
> > Log shows
Hi Boqun,
The base tree detection is based on the whole patchset's
- subjects
- touched files
- TO/CC list
Log shows the files and TO/CC are strongly related to powerpc,
so it looks a natural choice to apply to it. Especially you put
"linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org" in the TO list while
Hi Fengguang,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:29:14PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Boqun,
>
> The base tree detection is based on the whole patchset's
>
> - subjects
> - touched files
> - TO/CC list
>
> Log shows the files and TO/CC are strongly related to powerpc,
> so it looks a natural choice
> > BTW, does this bot have more tests than 0day? I have pushed this
> > patchset to my own repo and had it tested by 0day.
>
> Yes, it runs git am, the resulted commits are feed to 0day for
> build/boot/performance tests. If you've already pushed the patches via
> git, the robot should have skip
Some atomic operations now have _{relaxed, acquire, release} variants,
this patch then adds some trivial tests for two purpose:
1. test the behavior of these new operations in single-CPU
environment.
2. make their code generated before we actually use them somewhere,
so
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:02:00AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:42:24PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > Hi Fengguang,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:29:14PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > Hi Boqun,
> > >
> > > The base tree detection is based on the whole patchset's
12 matches
Mail list logo
