On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 11:51 +0900, Masashi Honma wrote:
> On 2016年08月02日 16:27, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > This explicitly configures *HT capability* though - that's even the
> > name of the parameter. If you enable HT40 in the capability, the
> > resulting BSS might still not actually *use* 40 MHz
On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 11:51 +0900, Masashi Honma wrote:
> On 2016年08月02日 16:27, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > This explicitly configures *HT capability* though - that's even the
> > name of the parameter. If you enable HT40 in the capability, the
> > resulting BSS might still not actually *use* 40 MHz
On 2016年08月02日 16:27, Johannes Berg wrote:
This explicitly configures *HT capability* though - that's even the
name of the parameter. If you enable HT40 in the capability, the
resulting BSS might still not actually *use* 40 MHz bandwidth, as
required by overlapping BSS detection.
OK, I see.
On 2016年08月02日 16:27, Johannes Berg wrote:
This explicitly configures *HT capability* though - that's even the
name of the parameter. If you enable HT40 in the capability, the
resulting BSS might still not actually *use* 40 MHz bandwidth, as
required by overlapping BSS detection.
OK, I see.
On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 11:59 +0900, Masashi Honma wrote:
> >
> > On 2016年08月01日 19:03, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > >
> > > But why is that behaviour *correct*? We still support 40 MHz
> > > bandwidth
> > > things, we just don't use them if we disable HT40.
>
> Or do you mean difference between
On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 11:59 +0900, Masashi Honma wrote:
> >
> > On 2016年08月01日 19:03, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > >
> > > But why is that behaviour *correct*? We still support 40 MHz
> > > bandwidth
> > > things, we just don't use them if we disable HT40.
>
> Or do you mean difference between
On 2016年08月01日 19:03, Johannes Berg wrote:
But why is that behaviour *correct*? We still support 40 MHz bandwidth
things, we just don't use them if we disable HT40.
Or do you mean difference between "hardware capability" and "software
capability" ?
Do you think
On 2016年08月01日 19:03, Johannes Berg wrote:
But why is that behaviour *correct*? We still support 40 MHz bandwidth
things, we just don't use them if we disable HT40.
Or do you mean difference between "hardware capability" and "software
capability" ?
Do you think
On 2016年08月01日 19:03, Johannes Berg wrote:
But why is that behaviour *correct*? We still support 40 MHz bandwidth
things, we just don't use them if we disable HT40.
I could not fully understand your concern...
Do you mean we have 2 bugs about disabling HT40 ?
1) bits in HT capabilities IE
On 2016年08月01日 19:03, Johannes Berg wrote:
But why is that behaviour *correct*? We still support 40 MHz bandwidth
things, we just don't use them if we disable HT40.
I could not fully understand your concern...
Do you mean we have 2 bugs about disabling HT40 ?
1) bits in HT capabilities IE
On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 14:26 +0900, Masashi Honma wrote:
> On 2016年07月14日 05:07, Yaniv Machani wrote:
> > +
> > + /* if channel width is 20MHz - configure HT capab
> > accordingly*/
> > + if (sdata->vif.bss_conf.chandef.width ==
> > NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20) {
> > + cap &=
On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 14:26 +0900, Masashi Honma wrote:
> On 2016年07月14日 05:07, Yaniv Machani wrote:
> > +
> > + /* if channel width is 20MHz - configure HT capab
> > accordingly*/
> > + if (sdata->vif.bss_conf.chandef.width ==
> > NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20) {
> > + cap &=
On 2016年07月22日 14:26, Masashi Honma wrote:
> On 2016年07月14日 05:07, Yaniv Machani wrote:
>> +
>> +/* if channel width is 20MHz - configure HT capab accordingly*/
>> +if (sdata->vif.bss_conf.chandef.width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20) {
>> +cap &= ~IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SUP_WIDTH_20_40;
>> +
On 2016年07月22日 14:26, Masashi Honma wrote:
> On 2016年07月14日 05:07, Yaniv Machani wrote:
>> +
>> +/* if channel width is 20MHz - configure HT capab accordingly*/
>> +if (sdata->vif.bss_conf.chandef.width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20) {
>> +cap &= ~IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SUP_WIDTH_20_40;
>> +
On 2016年07月14日 05:07, Yaniv Machani wrote:
+
+ /* if channel width is 20MHz - configure HT capab accordingly*/
+ if (sdata->vif.bss_conf.chandef.width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20) {
+ cap &= ~IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SUP_WIDTH_20_40;
+ cap &=
On 2016年07月14日 05:07, Yaniv Machani wrote:
+
+ /* if channel width is 20MHz - configure HT capab accordingly*/
+ if (sdata->vif.bss_conf.chandef.width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20) {
+ cap &= ~IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SUP_WIDTH_20_40;
+ cap &=
The HT capab info field inside the HT capab IE of the mesh beacon
is incorrect (in the case of 20MHz channel width).
To fix this driver will check configuration from cfg and
will build it accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Meirav Kama
Signed-off-by: Yaniv Machani
---
V3
The HT capab info field inside the HT capab IE of the mesh beacon
is incorrect (in the case of 20MHz channel width).
To fix this driver will check configuration from cfg and
will build it accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Meirav Kama
Signed-off-by: Yaniv Machani
---
V3 - Fixes redundant spaces,empty
18 matches
Mail list logo