On 02/17/19 at 08:53am, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 6:03 AM Baoquan He wrote:
> >
> > In memory region KASLR, __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT is taken to calculate
> > the initial size of the direct mapping region. This is correct in
> > the old code where __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT was equal to
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 6:03 AM Baoquan He wrote:
>
> In memory region KASLR, __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT is taken to calculate
> the initial size of the direct mapping region. This is correct in
> the old code where __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT was equal to MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS,
> 46 bits, and only 4-level mode
In memory region KASLR, __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT is taken to calculate
the initial size of the direct mapping region. This is correct in
the old code where __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT was equal to MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS,
46 bits, and only 4-level mode was supported.
Later, in commit b83ce5ee91471d ("x86/mm/64:
3 matches
Mail list logo