Re: [PATCH v3 45/51] x86: remove 64-byte gap at end of irq stack

2016-08-15 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 08:50:57AM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote: > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > >> There has been a 64-byte gap at the end of the irq stack for at least

Re: [PATCH v3 45/51] x86: remove 64-byte gap at end of irq stack

2016-08-15 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 08:50:57AM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote: > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > >> There has been a 64-byte gap at the end of the irq stack for at least 12 > >> years. It predates git history,

Re: [PATCH v3 45/51] x86: remove 64-byte gap at end of irq stack

2016-08-15 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 12:52:40AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > There has been a 64-byte gap at the end of the irq stack for at least 12 > > years. It predates git history, and I can't find any good reason for > >

Re: [PATCH v3 45/51] x86: remove 64-byte gap at end of irq stack

2016-08-15 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 12:52:40AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > There has been a 64-byte gap at the end of the irq stack for at least 12 > > years. It predates git history, and I can't find any good reason for > > it. Remove it.

Re: [PATCH v3 45/51] x86: remove 64-byte gap at end of irq stack

2016-08-14 Thread Brian Gerst
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: >> There has been a 64-byte gap at the end of the irq stack for at least 12 >> years. It predates git history, and I can't find any good

Re: [PATCH v3 45/51] x86: remove 64-byte gap at end of irq stack

2016-08-14 Thread Brian Gerst
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: >> There has been a 64-byte gap at the end of the irq stack for at least 12 >> years. It predates git history, and I can't find any good reason for >> it. Remove it. What's the

Re: [PATCH v3 45/51] x86: remove 64-byte gap at end of irq stack

2016-08-14 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > There has been a 64-byte gap at the end of the irq stack for at least 12 > years. It predates git history, and I can't find any good reason for > it. Remove it. What's the worst that could happen? I can't think of

Re: [PATCH v3 45/51] x86: remove 64-byte gap at end of irq stack

2016-08-14 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > There has been a 64-byte gap at the end of the irq stack for at least 12 > years. It predates git history, and I can't find any good reason for > it. Remove it. What's the worst that could happen? I can't think of any reason this would

[PATCH v3 45/51] x86: remove 64-byte gap at end of irq stack

2016-08-12 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
There has been a 64-byte gap at the end of the irq stack for at least 12 years. It predates git history, and I can't find any good reason for it. Remove it. What's the worst that could happen? Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf --- arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h | 3 ---

[PATCH v3 45/51] x86: remove 64-byte gap at end of irq stack

2016-08-12 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
There has been a 64-byte gap at the end of the irq stack for at least 12 years. It predates git history, and I can't find any good reason for it. Remove it. What's the worst that could happen? Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf --- arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h | 3 ---