Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] phy: exynos: Use one define for enable bit

2017-03-15 Thread Lee Jones
On Sat, 11 Mar 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > There is no need for separate defines for Exynos4 and Exynos5 phy enable > bit and MIPI phy reset bits. In both cases there are the same so > simplify it. > > This reduces number of defines and allows removal of one header file. > >

Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] phy: exynos: Use one define for enable bit

2017-03-15 Thread Lee Jones
On Sat, 11 Mar 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > There is no need for separate defines for Exynos4 and Exynos5 phy enable > bit and MIPI phy reset bits. In both cases there are the same so > simplify it. > > This reduces number of defines and allows removal of one header file. > >

[PATCH v3 5/5] phy: exynos: Use one define for enable bit

2017-03-11 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
There is no need for separate defines for Exynos4 and Exynos5 phy enable bit and MIPI phy reset bits. In both cases there are the same so simplify it. This reduces number of defines and allows removal of one header file. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Acked-by: Lee Jones

[PATCH v3 5/5] phy: exynos: Use one define for enable bit

2017-03-11 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
There is no need for separate defines for Exynos4 and Exynos5 phy enable bit and MIPI phy reset bits. In both cases there are the same so simplify it. This reduces number of defines and allows removal of one header file. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Acked-by: Lee Jones ---