On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> Hello, Pekka.
>
> Below is updated patch for 5/5 in this series.
> Now I get acks from Christoph to all patches in this series.
> So, could you merge this patchset? :)
> If you want to resend wholeset with proper ack, I will do it
> with pleasu
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> Now, the size of the freelist for the slab management diminish,
> so that the on-slab management structure can waste large space
> if the object of the slab is large.
>
> Consider a 128 byte sized slab. If on-slab is used, 31 objects can be
> in the slab.
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:13:08AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 02:58:41PM +, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >
> > > Now, the size of the freelist for the slab management diminish,
> > > so that the on-slab management structure can
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 02:58:41PM +, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> > Now, the size of the freelist for the slab management diminish,
> > so that the on-slab management structure can waste large space
> > if the object of the slab is large.
>
> Hmmm.. T
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> Now, the size of the freelist for the slab management diminish,
> so that the on-slab management structure can waste large space
> if the object of the slab is large.
Hmmm.. That is confusing to me. "Since the size of the freelist has shrunk
significantly
Now, the size of the freelist for the slab management diminish,
so that the on-slab management structure can waste large space
if the object of the slab is large.
Consider a 128 byte sized slab. If on-slab is used, 31 objects can be
in the slab. The size of the freelist for this case would be 31 b
6 matches
Mail list logo
