On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:14:50PM +, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Monday, March 02, 2015 12:00:21 PM Al Stone wrote:
>> > On 03/02/2015 10:29 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:36:24AM +, al.st...@linaro.org
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:14:50PM +, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, March 02, 2015 12:00:21 PM Al Stone wrote:
> > On 03/02/2015 10:29 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:36:24AM +, al.st...@linaro.org wrote:
> > >> diff --git
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:14:50PM +, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, March 02, 2015 12:00:21 PM Al Stone wrote:
On 03/02/2015 10:29 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:36:24AM +,
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:14:50PM +, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, March 02, 2015 12:00:21 PM Al Stone wrote:
On 03/02/2015 10:29 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:36:24AM +, al.st...@linaro.org wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi-blacklist.c
On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 05:36:24 PM al.st...@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Al Stone
>
> Now that all of the _OSI functionality has been separated out, we can
> provide arch-specific functionality for it. This also allows us to do
> the same for the acpi_blacklisted() function. We also make
On Monday, March 02, 2015 12:00:21 PM Al Stone wrote:
> On 03/02/2015 10:29 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi Al,
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:36:24AM +, al.st...@linaro.org wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi-blacklist.c
> >> b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi-blacklist.c
> >> new file
On Monday, March 02, 2015 12:00:21 PM Al Stone wrote:
On 03/02/2015 10:29 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Al,
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:36:24AM +, al.st...@linaro.org wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi-blacklist.c
b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi-blacklist.c
new file mode 100644
On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 05:36:24 PM al.st...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Al Stone al.st...@linaro.org
Now that all of the _OSI functionality has been separated out, we can
provide arch-specific functionality for it. This also allows us to do
the same for the acpi_blacklisted() function.
On 03/02/2015 10:29 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:36:24AM +, al.st...@linaro.org wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi-blacklist.c
>> b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi-blacklist.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000..1be6a56
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++
Hi Al,
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:36:24AM +, al.st...@linaro.org wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi-blacklist.c
> b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi-blacklist.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..1be6a56
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi-blacklist.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +/*
Hi Al,
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:36:24AM +, al.st...@linaro.org wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi-blacklist.c
b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi-blacklist.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..1be6a56
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi-blacklist.c
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+/*
+ *
On 03/02/2015 10:29 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Al,
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:36:24AM +, al.st...@linaro.org wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi-blacklist.c
b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi-blacklist.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..1be6a56
--- /dev/null
+++
From: Al Stone
Now that all of the _OSI functionality has been separated out, we can
provide arch-specific functionality for it. This also allows us to do
the same for the acpi_blacklisted() function. We also make sure the
defaults for the arm64 kernel are set so that the arch-specific _OSI
From: Al Stone al.st...@linaro.org
Now that all of the _OSI functionality has been separated out, we can
provide arch-specific functionality for it. This also allows us to do
the same for the acpi_blacklisted() function. We also make sure the
defaults for the arm64 kernel are set so that the
14 matches
Mail list logo
