Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> On 10.08.2015 10:27, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>
> >> W dniu 08.08.2015 o 11:07, Viresh Kumar pisze:
> >>> On 08-08-15, 00:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> OK, so please let me know which patches you want me to pick up.
>
>
Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 10.08.2015 10:27, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
W dniu 08.08.2015 o 11:07, Viresh Kumar pisze:
On 08-08-15, 00:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
OK, so please let me know which patches you want me to pick up.
Ideally, I'd prefer them to be
On 10.08.2015 10:27, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>
>> W dniu 08.08.2015 o 11:07, Viresh Kumar pisze:
>>> On 08-08-15, 00:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
OK, so please let me know which patches you want me to pick up.
Ideally, I'd prefer them to be resent in a
On 10.08.2015 10:27, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
W dniu 08.08.2015 o 11:07, Viresh Kumar pisze:
On 08-08-15, 00:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
OK, so please let me know which patches you want me to pick up.
Ideally, I'd prefer them to be resent in a separate series with ACKs
Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> W dniu 08.08.2015 o 11:07, Viresh Kumar pisze:
> > On 08-08-15, 00:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> OK, so please let me know which patches you want me to pick up.
> >>
> >> Ideally, I'd prefer them to be resent in a separate series with ACKs and
> >> all
> >>
Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
W dniu 08.08.2015 o 11:07, Viresh Kumar pisze:
On 08-08-15, 00:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
OK, so please let me know which patches you want me to pick up.
Ideally, I'd prefer them to be resent in a separate series with ACKs and
all
with a cover letter
On 08-08-15, 16:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Can you apply the 2-5 of this series to v4.3? It's getting late but
> maybe they still could go?
FWIW, 1/6 (updated version) is already applied by Rafael.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
W dniu 08.08.2015 o 11:07, Viresh Kumar pisze:
> On 08-08-15, 00:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> OK, so please let me know which patches you want me to pick up.
>>
>> Ideally, I'd prefer them to be resent in a separate series with ACKs and all
>> with a cover letter clearly stating whose tree they
W dniu 08.08.2015 o 11:07, Viresh Kumar pisze:
On 08-08-15, 00:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
OK, so please let me know which patches you want me to pick up.
Ideally, I'd prefer them to be resent in a separate series with ACKs and all
with a cover letter clearly stating whose tree they are
On 08-08-15, 16:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
Can you apply the 2-5 of this series to v4.3? It's getting late but
maybe they still could go?
FWIW, 1/6 (updated version) is already applied by Rafael.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the
On 08-08-15, 00:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> OK, so please let me know which patches you want me to pick up.
>
> Ideally, I'd prefer them to be resent in a separate series with ACKs and all
> with a cover letter clearly stating whose tree they are being targeted at.
He already sent it
On Friday, August 07, 2015 05:26:27 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 07-08-15, 13:47, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Hmm, wait. Patch 6/6 depends on earlier changes. I cannot remove
> > the config option in question now as it is currently used by
> > exynos-cpufreq specific boost support.
On 07-08-15, 13:47, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Hmm, wait. Patch 6/6 depends on earlier changes. I cannot remove
> the config option in question now as it is currently used by
> exynos-cpufreq specific boost support. Patch 1/6 can be applied
> now but 6/6 needs to wait for patches 2-5 to
On Friday, August 07, 2015 05:09:50 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 07-08-15, 13:31, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Users don't need to enable the config option to get boost
> > functionality working. It is only needed to get scaling_boost_freqs
> > sysfs attribute visible (which lists
On 07-08-15, 13:31, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Users don't need to enable the config option to get boost
> functionality working. It is only needed to get scaling_boost_freqs
> sysfs attribute visible (which lists available boost freqs) when
> using cpufreq-dt driver. Also the config
Hi,
On Friday, August 07, 2015 10:48:26 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 07-08-15, 13:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Thanks for explanation. As fair as I understand, Bartlomiej wanted to
> > merge this in a way which would avoid loosing the boost mode. Kukjin
> > prepared topic branches for
On 08-08-15, 00:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
OK, so please let me know which patches you want me to pick up.
Ideally, I'd prefer them to be resent in a separate series with ACKs and all
with a cover letter clearly stating whose tree they are being targeted at.
He already sent it separately,
On Friday, August 07, 2015 05:26:27 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 07-08-15, 13:47, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hmm, wait. Patch 6/6 depends on earlier changes. I cannot remove
the config option in question now as it is currently used by
exynos-cpufreq specific boost support. Patch 1/6
Hi,
On Friday, August 07, 2015 10:48:26 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 07-08-15, 13:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
Thanks for explanation. As fair as I understand, Bartlomiej wanted to
merge this in a way which would avoid loosing the boost mode. Kukjin
prepared topic branches for previous
On Friday, August 07, 2015 05:09:50 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 07-08-15, 13:31, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Users don't need to enable the config option to get boost
functionality working. It is only needed to get scaling_boost_freqs
sysfs attribute visible (which lists available boost
On 07-08-15, 13:31, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Users don't need to enable the config option to get boost
functionality working. It is only needed to get scaling_boost_freqs
sysfs attribute visible (which lists available boost freqs) when
using cpufreq-dt driver. Also the config option
On 07-08-15, 13:47, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hmm, wait. Patch 6/6 depends on earlier changes. I cannot remove
the config option in question now as it is currently used by
exynos-cpufreq specific boost support. Patch 1/6 can be applied
now but 6/6 needs to wait for patches 2-5 to be
On 07-08-15, 13:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Thanks for explanation. As fair as I understand, Bartlomiej wanted to
> merge this in a way which would avoid loosing the boost mode. Kukjin
> prepared topic branches for previous cpu-freq/clk stuff so maybe
> everything could go through PM?
We
On 07.08.2015 13:30, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 07-08-15, 13:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Still patches 1/6 and 6/6 need your acks. Is the patch 1/6 a
>> prerequisite for others? It does not look like a prerequisite... but it
>> was put at the beginning of the patchset.
>
> Patch 1/6 is
On 07-08-15, 13:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Still patches 1/6 and 6/6 need your acks. Is the patch 1/6 a
> prerequisite for others? It does not look like a prerequisite... but it
> was put at the beginning of the patchset.
Patch 1/6 is required to get boost working, that's all.. Not sure how
On 07.08.2015 12:51, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Fixed Olof's email id..
>
> On 07-08-15, 09:20, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Cc'ing Rafael again. Guys please don't miss him for any PM related
>> stuff or use get_maintainers ..
>>
>> Cc'ing Arnd/Olof as well to discuss the merge stuff..
>>
>> On 07-08-15,
Fixed Olof's email id..
On 07-08-15, 09:20, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Cc'ing Rafael again. Guys please don't miss him for any PM related
> stuff or use get_maintainers ..
>
> Cc'ing Arnd/Olof as well to discuss the merge stuff..
>
> On 07-08-15, 08:53, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > Depends on:
> > > -
Cc'ing Rafael again. Guys please don't miss him for any PM related
stuff or use get_maintainers ..
Cc'ing Arnd/Olof as well to discuss the merge stuff..
On 07-08-15, 08:53, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Depends on:
> > - next-20150806 branch of linux-next kernel tree
> > - "[PATCH V3 00/16] OPP: Add
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
Hi Bart,
> This patch series removes the use of Exynos4x12 specific support
> from cpufreq-exynos driver and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver
> for this platform.
>
Thanks for this series.
> This patch series has been tested on Exynos4412 based
Hi,
This patch series removes the use of Exynos4x12 specific support
from cpufreq-exynos driver and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver
for this platform.
This patch series has been tested on Exynos4412 based Odroid-U3 and
Trats2 boards.
Depends on:
- next-20150806 branch of linux-next kernel
Cc'ing Rafael again. Guys please don't miss him for any PM related
stuff or use get_maintainers ..
Cc'ing Arnd/Olof as well to discuss the merge stuff..
On 07-08-15, 08:53, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Depends on:
- next-20150806 branch of linux-next kernel tree
- [PATCH V3 00/16] OPP: Add code to
Fixed Olof's email id..
On 07-08-15, 09:20, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Cc'ing Rafael again. Guys please don't miss him for any PM related
stuff or use get_maintainers ..
Cc'ing Arnd/Olof as well to discuss the merge stuff..
On 07-08-15, 08:53, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Depends on:
- next-20150806
On 07-08-15, 13:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
Thanks for explanation. As fair as I understand, Bartlomiej wanted to
merge this in a way which would avoid loosing the boost mode. Kukjin
prepared topic branches for previous cpu-freq/clk stuff so maybe
everything could go through PM?
We aren't
On 07.08.2015 12:51, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Fixed Olof's email id..
On 07-08-15, 09:20, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Cc'ing Rafael again. Guys please don't miss him for any PM related
stuff or use get_maintainers ..
Cc'ing Arnd/Olof as well to discuss the merge stuff..
On 07-08-15, 08:53, Kukjin Kim
On 07.08.2015 13:30, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 07-08-15, 13:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
Still patches 1/6 and 6/6 need your acks. Is the patch 1/6 a
prerequisite for others? It does not look like a prerequisite... but it
was put at the beginning of the patchset.
Patch 1/6 is required to get
On 07-08-15, 13:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
Still patches 1/6 and 6/6 need your acks. Is the patch 1/6 a
prerequisite for others? It does not look like a prerequisite... but it
was put at the beginning of the patchset.
Patch 1/6 is required to get boost working, that's all.. Not sure how
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
Hi Bart,
This patch series removes the use of Exynos4x12 specific support
from cpufreq-exynos driver and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver
for this platform.
Thanks for this series.
This patch series has been tested on Exynos4412 based Odroid-U3
Hi,
This patch series removes the use of Exynos4x12 specific support
from cpufreq-exynos driver and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver
for this platform.
This patch series has been tested on Exynos4412 based Odroid-U3 and
Trats2 boards.
Depends on:
- next-20150806 branch of linux-next kernel
38 matches
Mail list logo
