Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] generic early_ioremap support

2014-03-03 Thread H. Peter Anvin
All three . On March 3, 2014 2:29:08 PM PST, Mark Salter wrote: >On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 11:42 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 02/25/2014 10:45 AM, Mark Salter wrote: >> > On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 18:30 +, Will Deacon wrote: >> >> I'd suggest spitting the core part out from the arch-specific >p

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] generic early_ioremap support

2014-03-03 Thread Mark Salter
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 11:42 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 02/25/2014 10:45 AM, Mark Salter wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 18:30 +, Will Deacon wrote: > >> I'd suggest spitting the core part out from the arch-specific parts. That > >> way, the core part can merged independently and archite

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] generic early_ioremap support

2014-02-25 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 02/25/2014 03:04 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > I think the series still need an ack from rmk at least on the arm patch > (4/6). > OK. Russell? -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org Mor

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] generic early_ioremap support

2014-02-25 Thread Catalin Marinas
On 25 Feb 2014, at 19:42, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 02/25/2014 10:45 AM, Mark Salter wrote: >> On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 18:30 +, Will Deacon wrote: >>> I'd suggest spitting the core part out from the arch-specific parts. That >>> way, the core part can merged independently and architectures can

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] generic early_ioremap support

2014-02-25 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 02/25/2014 10:45 AM, Mark Salter wrote: > On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 18:30 +, Will Deacon wrote: >> I'd suggest spitting the core part out from the arch-specific parts. That >> way, the core part can merged independently and architectures can move over >> as they see fit. It also signals (at leas

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] generic early_ioremap support

2014-02-25 Thread Mark Salter
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 18:30 +, Will Deacon wrote: > I'd suggest spitting the core part out from the arch-specific parts. That > way, the core part can merged independently and architectures can move over > as they see fit. It also signals (at least to me) that, "hey, I should > probably review

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] generic early_ioremap support

2014-02-25 Thread Will Deacon
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 02:10:04PM +, Mark Salter wrote: > On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 15:56 -0500, Mark Salter wrote: > > This patch series takes the common bits from the x86 early ioremap > > implementation and creates a generic implementation which may be used > > by other architectures. The early

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] generic early_ioremap support

2014-02-25 Thread Mark Salter
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 15:56 -0500, Mark Salter wrote: > This patch series takes the common bits from the x86 early ioremap > implementation and creates a generic implementation which may be used > by other architectures. The early ioremap interfaces are intended for > situations where boot code nee

[PATCH v4 0/6] generic early_ioremap support

2014-02-12 Thread Mark Salter
This patch series takes the common bits from the x86 early ioremap implementation and creates a generic implementation which may be used by other architectures. The early ioremap interfaces are intended for situations where boot code needs to make temporary virtual mappings before the normal iorema