Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] Modernization and fixes for NuBus subsystem

2018-01-07 Thread Finn Thain
On Sun, 7 Jan 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > it does complain when using spaces only ("please, no spaces at the > _start_ of a line"). > Checkpatch accepts this tab: int map(struct mm_id * mm_idp, unsigned long virt, unsigned long len, int prot, int phys_fd, unsigned long long

Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] Modernization and fixes for NuBus subsystem

2018-01-07 Thread Finn Thain
On Sun, 7 Jan 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > it does complain when using spaces only ("please, no spaces at the > _start_ of a line"). > Checkpatch accepts this tab: int map(struct mm_id * mm_idp, unsigned long virt, unsigned long len, int prot, int phys_fd, unsigned long long

Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] Modernization and fixes for NuBus subsystem

2018-01-07 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Finn, On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 4:34 AM, Finn Thain wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jan 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> I assume you meant this to go in through the m68k tree? > > Yes, please. Because the NuBus-PowerMac port is out-of-tree, the m68k tree > seems more

Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] Modernization and fixes for NuBus subsystem

2018-01-07 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Finn, On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 4:34 AM, Finn Thain wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jan 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> I assume you meant this to go in through the m68k tree? > > Yes, please. Because the NuBus-PowerMac port is out-of-tree, the m68k tree > seems more appropriate than the powerpc tree for

Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] Modernization and fixes for NuBus subsystem

2018-01-05 Thread Finn Thain
Hi Geert, On Fri, 5 Jan 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > I assume you meant this to go in through the m68k tree? > Yes, please. Because the NuBus-PowerMac port is out-of-tree, the m68k tree seems more appropriate than the powerpc tree for this submission. > Can you please run this

Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] Modernization and fixes for NuBus subsystem

2018-01-05 Thread Finn Thain
Hi Geert, On Fri, 5 Jan 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > I assume you meant this to go in through the m68k tree? > Yes, please. Because the NuBus-PowerMac port is out-of-tree, the m68k tree seems more appropriate than the powerpc tree for this submission. > Can you please run this

Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] Modernization and fixes for NuBus subsystem

2018-01-05 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Finn, On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Finn Thain wrote: > This series begins with cleanups and fixes for the NuBus subsystem and > finishes with a patch to add support for the Linux Driver Model. > A separate series (which requires this one) modernizes NuBus

Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] Modernization and fixes for NuBus subsystem

2018-01-05 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Finn, On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Finn Thain wrote: > This series begins with cleanups and fixes for the NuBus subsystem and > finishes with a patch to add support for the Linux Driver Model. > A separate series (which requires this one) modernizes NuBus drivers. Thanks for your series!

[PATCH v4 00/14] Modernization and fixes for NuBus subsystem

2017-12-13 Thread Finn Thain
This series begins with cleanups and fixes for the NuBus subsystem and finishes with a patch to add support for the Linux Driver Model. A separate series (which requires this one) modernizes NuBus drivers. Changes since v1: - Added the missing NULL check in nubus_device_remove(). - Squashed the

[PATCH v4 00/14] Modernization and fixes for NuBus subsystem

2017-12-13 Thread Finn Thain
This series begins with cleanups and fixes for the NuBus subsystem and finishes with a patch to add support for the Linux Driver Model. A separate series (which requires this one) modernizes NuBus drivers. Changes since v1: - Added the missing NULL check in nubus_device_remove(). - Squashed the