On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 10:52 AM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:38:28AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > > I think you will be the first to use the namespace stuff for this, it
> > > seems like a good idea and others should probably do so as well.
> >
> > I was thinking
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:38:28AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > I think you will be the first to use the namespace stuff for this, it
> > seems like a good idea and others should probably do so as well.
>
> I was thinking either EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS, or auxiliary bus, because you
> should be able
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 10:26 AM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 11:18:33AM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 11/2/2020 10:19 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 08:20:43AM -0800, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> > > > Creating these private interfaces for
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 11:18:33AM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
>
>
> On 11/2/2020 10:19 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 08:20:43AM -0800, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> > > Creating these private interfaces for intra-module are just 1-1 and not
> > > general purpose and every
On 11/2/2020 10:19 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 08:20:43AM -0800, Raj, Ashok wrote:
Creating these private interfaces for intra-module are just 1-1 and not
general purpose and every accelerator needs to create these instances.
This is where we are going, auxillary bus
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 08:20:43AM -0800, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> Creating these private interfaces for intra-module are just 1-1 and not
> general purpose and every accelerator needs to create these instances.
This is where we are going, auxillary bus should be merged soon which
is specifically to
Hi Jason
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 09:20:36AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > of IDXD for guest drivers. These look and feel like IDXD, not another
> > device
> > interface. In that sense if we move PF/VF mailboxes as
> > separate drivers i thought it feels a bit odd.
>
> You need this split
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 04:53:59PM -0700, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> If we are doing this just to improve review effectiveness, Now we would need
> some parent driver, and these sub-drivers registering seemed like a bit of
> over-engineering when these sub-drivers actually are an extension of the
> base
Hi Thomas,
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 03:50:43AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Ashok,
>
> < skip a lot of non-sensical arguments>
Ouch!.. Didn't mean to awaken you like this :-).. apologies.. profusely!
>
> Just because there is historical precendence which does not care about
> the
Ashok,
On Fri, Oct 30 2020 at 13:43, Ashok Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 04:30:45PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:23:25PM -0700, Raj, Ashok wrote:
>> It is a different subsystem, different maintainer, and different
>> reviewers.
>>
>> It is a development
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 01:43:07PM -0700, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> So drawing that parallel, do you expect all drivers that call
> pci_register_driver() to be located in drivers/pci? Aren't they scattered
> all over the place ata,scsi, platform drivers and such?
The subsystem is the thing that calls
On Fri, Oct 30 2020 at 13:59, Dave Jiang wrote:
> On 10/30/2020 1:48 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 30 2020 at 11:50, Dave Jiang wrote:
>>> The code has dependency on Thomas’s MSI restructuring patch series:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200826111628.794979...@linutronix.de/
>>
>>
On 10/30/2020 1:48 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30 2020 at 11:50, Dave Jiang wrote:
The code has dependency on Thomas’s MSI restructuring patch series:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200826111628.794979...@linutronix.de/
which is outdated and not longer applicable.
Yes I
On Fri, Oct 30 2020 at 11:50, Dave Jiang wrote:
> The code has dependency on Thomas’s MSI restructuring patch series:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200826111628.794979...@linutronix.de/
which is outdated and not longer applicable.
Thanks,
tglx
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 04:30:45PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:23:25PM -0700, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 04:17:06PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:13:48PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:23:25PM -0700, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 04:17:06PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:13:48PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/30/2020 11:58 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 04:17:06PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:13:48PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 10/30/2020 11:58 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:50:47AM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> > > >
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:13:48PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
>
>
> On 10/30/2020 11:58 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:50:47AM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> > > .../ABI/stable/sysfs-driver-dma-idxd |6 +
> > > Documentation/driver-api/vfio/mdev-idxd.rst |
On 10/30/2020 11:58 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:50:47AM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
.../ABI/stable/sysfs-driver-dma-idxd |6 +
Documentation/driver-api/vfio/mdev-idxd.rst | 404 ++
MAINTAINERS |1 +
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:50:47AM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> .../ABI/stable/sysfs-driver-dma-idxd |6 +
> Documentation/driver-api/vfio/mdev-idxd.rst | 404 ++
> MAINTAINERS |1 +
> drivers/dma/Kconfig |9 +
>
- Would like to acquire Reviewed-by tags from Thomas for MSI and IMS related
bits.
- Would like to acquire for Reviewed-by tags from Alex and/or Kirti for the
VFIO mdev driver bits.
- Would like to acquire for Reviewed-by tag from Bjorn for PCI common bits
- Would like to acquire 5.11 kernel
21 matches
Mail list logo
