Hi Alex,
On 2019/9/6 22:25, Alex Kogan wrote:
> The new macro should accept the value to be stored into the lock argument
> as another argument. This allows using the same macro in cases where the
> value to be stored when passing the lock is different from 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Kogan
>
The new macro should accept the value to be stored into the lock argument
as another argument. This allows using the same macro in cases where the
value to be stored when passing the lock is different from 1.
Signed-off-by: Alex Kogan
Reviewed-by: Steve Sistare
---
2 matches
Mail list logo