at 5:40 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> In the meanwhile, CFLAGS_REMOVE_ will do
> as a workaround.
Thanks! I appreciate your help.
I will submit tomorrow an updated version.
Regards,
Nadav
2018-06-14 5:36 GMT+09:00 Sam Ravnborg :
>>
>> > +macros: $(obj)/macros.s
>> > + @:
>>
>> If you add a phony target, it should be added to 'PHONY'.
>
> Or this part:
>> +archmacros:
>> + $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=arch/x86/kernel macros
>
> could be modified to specify the exact filename so t
Hi.
2018-06-14 7:19 GMT+09:00 Nadav Amit :
>>
>>
>> I have not fully understood this series yet.
>>
>> I do not have enough skill in x86 architecture,
>> but just some comments from the build system point of view.
>>
>>
>>
>> I guess this will probably break the parallel building.
>>
>> Kbuild can
Thanks for your comment! I am certainly Makefile-challenged, so your help is
highly appreciated.
Please see my responses/questions inline.
at 10:43 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2018-06-12 20:50 GMT+09:00 Nadav Amit :
>> Using macros for inline assembly improves both readability and
>> compilati
>
> > +macros: $(obj)/macros.s
> > + @:
>
> If you add a phony target, it should be added to 'PHONY'.
Or this part:
> +archmacros:
> + $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=arch/x86/kernel macros
could be modified to specify the exact filename so this indirection is not
needed.
PS. Only one file p
Hi.
2018-06-12 20:50 GMT+09:00 Nadav Amit :
> Using macros for inline assembly improves both readability and
> compilation decisions that are distorted by big assembly blocks that use
> alternative sections. Compile macros.S and use it to assemble all C
> files. Currently, only x86 will use it.
>
Using macros for inline assembly improves both readability and
compilation decisions that are distorted by big assembly blocks that use
alternative sections. Compile macros.S and use it to assemble all C
files. Currently, only x86 will use it.
Cc: Masahiro Yamada
Cc: Michal Marek
Cc: Thomas Glei
7 matches
Mail list logo
