On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 22:58 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > > so what if there are two CPU packages
> > > and there are highest_perf differences in both, and we first enumerate
> > > the first package entirely before getting to the second one?
> > >
> > > In that case we'll schedule the
On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 22:58 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > > so what if there are two CPU packages
> > > and there are highest_perf differences in both, and we first enumerate
> > > the first package entirely before getting to the second one?
> > >
> > > In that case we'll schedule the
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Tim Chen wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 22:30 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > +
>> > +static void
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Tim Chen wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 22:30 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > +
>> > +static void intel_pstate_check_and_enable_itmt(int cpu)
>> > +{
>> > + /*
>> > +*
On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 20:56 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Tim Chen wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 22:30 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > My current understanding is that we need to rebuild sched domains
> > > after setting the priorities,
> > No, that's
On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 20:56 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Tim Chen wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 22:30 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > My current understanding is that we need to rebuild sched domains
> > > after setting the priorities,
> > No, that's
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Tim Chen wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 22:30 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > My current understanding is that we need to rebuild sched domains
> > after setting the priorities,
>
> No, that's not true. We need to rebuild the sched domains only
> when the sched domain
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Tim Chen wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 22:30 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > My current understanding is that we need to rebuild sched domains
> > after setting the priorities,
>
> No, that's not true. We need to rebuild the sched domains only
> when the sched domain
On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 22:30 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > +
> > +static void intel_pstate_check_and_enable_itmt(int cpu)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > +* For checking whether
On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 22:30 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > +
> > +static void intel_pstate_check_and_enable_itmt(int cpu)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > +* For checking whether there is any difference in the maximum
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada
wrote:
> This change uses acpi cppc_lib interface to get CPPC performance limits.
> Once CPPC limits of all online cores are read, first check if there is
> difference in max performance. If there is a
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada
wrote:
> This change uses acpi cppc_lib interface to get CPPC performance limits.
> Once CPPC limits of all online cores are read, first check if there is
> difference in max performance. If there is a difference, then the
> scheduler interface
This change uses acpi cppc_lib interface to get CPPC performance limits.
Once CPPC limits of all online cores are read, first check if there is
difference in max performance. If there is a difference, then the
scheduler interface is called to update per cpu priority and enable
ITMT feature.
Here
This change uses acpi cppc_lib interface to get CPPC performance limits.
Once CPPC limits of all online cores are read, first check if there is
difference in max performance. If there is a difference, then the
scheduler interface is called to update per cpu priority and enable
ITMT feature.
Here
14 matches
Mail list logo