Re: [PATCH v4 11/13] mm/mempolicy: huge-page allocation for many preferred

2021-04-15 Thread Feng Tang
Hi Michal, Many thanks for reviewing the whole patchset! We will check them. On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 03:25:34PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > Please use hugetlb prefix to make it explicit that this is hugetlb > related. > > On Wed 17-03-21 11:40:08, Feng Tang wrote: > > From: Ben Widawsky > >

Re: [PATCH v4 11/13] mm/mempolicy: huge-page allocation for many preferred

2021-04-14 Thread Michal Hocko
Please use hugetlb prefix to make it explicit that this is hugetlb related. On Wed 17-03-21 11:40:08, Feng Tang wrote: > From: Ben Widawsky > > Implement the missing huge page allocation functionality while obeying > the preferred node semantics. > > This uses a fallback mechanism to try

Re: [PATCH v4 11/13] mm/mempolicy: huge-page allocation for many preferred

2021-03-17 Thread kernel test robot
Hi Feng, I love your patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on linux/master] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.12-rc3] [cannot apply to next-20210316] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use

[PATCH v4 11/13] mm/mempolicy: huge-page allocation for many preferred

2021-03-16 Thread Feng Tang
From: Ben Widawsky Implement the missing huge page allocation functionality while obeying the preferred node semantics. This uses a fallback mechanism to try multiple preferred nodes first, and then all other nodes. It cannot use the helper function that was introduced because huge page