On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 08:21:59AM +0530, Nipun Gupta wrote:
> With each bus implementing its own DMA configuration callback,
> there is no need for bus to explicitly have force_dma in its
> global structure. This patch modifies of_dma_configure API to
> accept an input parameter which specifies
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 08:21:59AM +0530, Nipun Gupta wrote:
> With each bus implementing its own DMA configuration callback,
> there is no need for bus to explicitly have force_dma in its
> global structure. This patch modifies of_dma_configure API to
> accept an input parameter which specifies
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 08:21:59AM +0530, Nipun Gupta wrote:
> With each bus implementing its own DMA configuration callback,
> there is no need for bus to explicitly have force_dma in its
> global structure. This patch modifies of_dma_configure API to
> accept an input parameter which specifies
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 08:21:59AM +0530, Nipun Gupta wrote:
> With each bus implementing its own DMA configuration callback,
> there is no need for bus to explicitly have force_dma in its
> global structure. This patch modifies of_dma_configure API to
> accept an input parameter which specifies
With each bus implementing its own DMA configuration callback,
there is no need for bus to explicitly have force_dma in its
global structure. This patch modifies of_dma_configure API to
accept an input parameter which specifies if implicit DMA
configuration is required even when it is not
With each bus implementing its own DMA configuration callback,
there is no need for bus to explicitly have force_dma in its
global structure. This patch modifies of_dma_configure API to
accept an input parameter which specifies if implicit DMA
configuration is required even when it is not
6 matches
Mail list logo
