On Saturday 28 March 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> It's not as much a problem as a generic question : does a driver belong to
> arch/* ?
>
> Personaly it would have been far simpler for me to have it through the pxa
> tree,
> but I want to be sure it's the right place. Others will follow, pxa
Arnd Bergmann writes:
> On Thursday 26 March 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>>
>> Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>> >> If there is no solution, I'll fallback through arch/arm/plat-pxa, not
>> >> very nice,
>> >> but it has to
On Saturday 28 March 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
It's not as much a problem as a generic question : does a driver belong to
arch/* ?
Personaly it would have been far simpler for me to have it through the pxa
tree,
but I want to be sure it's the right place. Others will follow, pxa
Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de writes:
On Thursday 26 March 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
If there is no solution, I'll fallback through arch/arm/plat-pxa, not
very nice,
On Thursday 26 March 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
> Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> >> If there is no solution, I'll fallback through arch/arm/plat-pxa, not very
> >> nice,
> >> but it has to land somewhere, I don't want
On Thursday 26 March 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
If there is no solution, I'll fallback through arch/arm/plat-pxa, not very
nice,
but it has to land somewhere, I
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:38:54PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> >> If there is no solution, I'll fallback through arch/arm/plat-pxa, not very
> >> nice,
> >> but it has to land somewhere, I
Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>> If there is no solution, I'll fallback through arch/arm/plat-pxa, not very
>> nice,
>> but it has to land somewhere, I don't want lubbock to remain broken.
>
> drivers/platform/arm ?
Most certainly.
Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
If there is no solution, I'll fallback through arch/arm/plat-pxa, not very
nice,
but it has to land somewhere, I don't want lubbock to remain broken.
drivers/platform/arm ?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:38:54PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
If there is no solution, I'll fallback through arch/arm/plat-pxa, not very
nice,
but it has to land
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Lee Jones writes:
> >> > Arnd, Greg,
> >> >
> >> > Perhaps you have some ideas WRT programmables (PLDs/CPLDs/FPGAs)?
>
> Hi Arnd and Greg,
>
> I have this driver I'm upstreaming, which comes out of
>
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org writes:
Arnd, Greg,
Perhaps you have some ideas WRT programmables (PLDs/CPLDs/FPGAs)?
Hi Arnd and Greg,
I have this driver I'm upstreaming, which comes out of
Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 10:57:30AM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>> Robert Jarzmik writes:
>>
>> > Hi Arnd and Greg,
>> It's been a week, backlog ping ?
>
> If only my backlog was just one week...
Ah, that's bad :)
> And I'm not the mfd maintainer...
I know. The
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 10:57:30AM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Robert Jarzmik writes:
>
> > Hi Arnd and Greg,
> It's been a week, backlog ping ?
If only my backlog was just one week...
And I'm not the mfd maintainer...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Robert Jarzmik writes:
> Hi Arnd and Greg,
It's been a week, backlog ping ?
>
> I have this driver I'm upstreaming, which comes out of
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c. As for the reason it is extracted, see submitted
> commit [1] for reference.
>
> The main question is : where does it belong in
Robert Jarzmik robert.jarz...@free.fr writes:
Hi Arnd and Greg,
It's been a week, backlog ping ?
I have this driver I'm upstreaming, which comes out of
arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c. As for the reason it is extracted, see submitted
commit [1] for reference.
The main question is : where does
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 10:57:30AM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
Robert Jarzmik robert.jarz...@free.fr writes:
Hi Arnd and Greg,
It's been a week, backlog ping ?
If only my backlog was just one week...
And I'm not the mfd maintainer...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 10:57:30AM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
Robert Jarzmik robert.jarz...@free.fr writes:
Hi Arnd and Greg,
It's been a week, backlog ping ?
If only my backlog was just one week...
Ah, that's bad :)
And I'm not
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > Arnd, Greg,
> >
> > Perhaps you have some ideas WRT programmables (PLDs/CPLDs/FPGAs)?
>
> FWIW...
>
> The Lubbock is an ancient development board (circa 2003) using a CPLD to
> multiplex a couple things
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
Arnd, Greg,
Perhaps you have some ideas WRT programmables (PLDs/CPLDs/FPGAs)?
FWIW...
The Lubbock is an ancient development board (circa 2003) using a CPLD to
multiplex a couple things on the board.
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
> Arnd, Greg,
>
> Perhaps you have some ideas WRT programmables (PLDs/CPLDs/FPGAs)?
FWIW...
The Lubbock is an ancient development board (circa 2003) using a CPLD to
multiplex a couple things on the board. I really doubt anyone would
reprogram this
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
Arnd, Greg,
Perhaps you have some ideas WRT programmables (PLDs/CPLDs/FPGAs)?
FWIW...
The Lubbock is an ancient development board (circa 2003) using a CPLD to
multiplex a couple things on the board. I really doubt anyone would
reprogram this CPLD
Arnd, Greg,
Perhaps you have some ideas WRT programmables (PLDs/CPLDs/FPGAs)?
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Lee Jones wrote:
> > What's all this? Please configure your mail client correctly.
> >
> > For advice, see:
> >
> > Documentation/email-clients.txt
> While at day work,
Lee Jones writes:
> What's all this? Please configure your mail client correctly.
>
> For advice, see:
>
> Documentation/email-clients.txt
While at day work, I have only access to web mail ...
>> 2) after v2, we _both_ agreed that the accurate name is "cplds"
>> which exactly what is in
mar Gala" , "Daniel
> Mack" , "Haojian Zhuang" ,
> "Samuel Ortiz" , "Grant Likely"
> , devicet...@vger.kernel.org,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org, "Arnd
> Bergmann" , "Russell King - ARM Li
z" , "Grant Likely" ,
devicet...@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org, "Arnd Bergmann" , "Russell
King - ARM Linux" , "Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov"
Envoyé: Lundi 16 Février 2015 14:05:49
Objet: Re: [PATCH
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Lubbock () board is the IO motherboard of the Intel PXA25x Development
> Platform, which supports the Lubbock pxa25x soc board.
>
> Historically, this support was in arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c. When
> gpio-pxa was moved to drivers/pxa, it became a
Bergmann a...@arndb.de, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov dbarysh...@gmail.com
Envoyé: Lundi 16 Février 2015 14:05:49
Objet: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] mfd: lubbock_cplds: add lubbock IO board
What's all this? Please configure your mail client correctly
Arnd, Greg,
Perhaps you have some ideas WRT programmables (PLDs/CPLDs/FPGAs)?
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
Lee Jones wrote:
What's all this? Please configure your mail client correctly.
For advice, see:
Documentation/email-clients.txt
While at day work, I have only
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
Lubbock () board is the IO motherboard of the Intel PXA25x Development
Platform, which supports the Lubbock pxa25x soc board.
Historically, this support was in arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c. When
gpio-pxa was moved to drivers/pxa, it became a driver,
...@arm.linux.org.uk, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
dbarysh...@gmail.com
Envoyé: Lundi 16 Février 2015 14:05:49
Objet: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] mfd: lubbock_cplds: add lubbock IO board
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
---
Since v1: change the name from cottula to lubbock_io
Dmitry pointed out
Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org writes:
What's all this? Please configure your mail client correctly.
For advice, see:
Documentation/email-clients.txt
While at day work, I have only access to web mail ...
2) after v2, we _both_ agreed that the accurate name is cplds
which exactly
Lubbock () board is the IO motherboard of the Intel PXA25x Development
Platform, which supports the Lubbock pxa25x soc board.
Historically, this support was in arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c. When
gpio-pxa was moved to drivers/pxa, it became a driver, and its
initialization and probing happened at
Lubbock () board is the IO motherboard of the Intel PXA25x Development
Platform, which supports the Lubbock pxa25x soc board.
Historically, this support was in arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c. When
gpio-pxa was moved to drivers/pxa, it became a driver, and its
initialization and probing happened at
34 matches
Mail list logo
