On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 05:04:02PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:39:53PM +, Popa, Stefan Serban wrote:
> > On Lu, 2018-08-06 at 15:39 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > I suggested having an explicit operation to check if a register supports
> > > this mode of operation
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 05:04:02PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:39:53PM +, Popa, Stefan Serban wrote:
> > On Lu, 2018-08-06 at 15:39 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > I suggested having an explicit operation to check if a register supports
> > > this mode of operation
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:39:53PM +, Popa, Stefan Serban wrote:
> On Lu, 2018-08-06 at 15:39 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I suggested having an explicit operation to check if a register supports
> > this mode of operation when I reviewed an earlier version, I didn't
> > notice a reply on
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:39:53PM +, Popa, Stefan Serban wrote:
> On Lu, 2018-08-06 at 15:39 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I suggested having an explicit operation to check if a register supports
> > this mode of operation when I reviewed an earlier version, I didn't
> > notice a reply on
On Lu, 2018-08-06 at 15:39 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:04:44PM +0300, Stefan Popa wrote:
>
> >
> > + if (!regmap_volatile(map, reg) || !regmap_readable(map, reg))
> > {
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > + }
> I suggested having an
On Lu, 2018-08-06 at 15:39 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:04:44PM +0300, Stefan Popa wrote:
>
> >
> > + if (!regmap_volatile(map, reg) || !regmap_readable(map, reg))
> > {
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > + }
> I suggested having an
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:04:44PM +0300, Stefan Popa wrote:
> + if (!regmap_volatile(map, reg) || !regmap_readable(map, reg)) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
I suggested having an explicit operation to check if a register supports
this mode of
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:04:44PM +0300, Stefan Popa wrote:
> + if (!regmap_volatile(map, reg) || !regmap_readable(map, reg)) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
I suggested having an explicit operation to check if a register supports
this mode of
From: Crestez Dan Leonard
The regmap API usually assumes that bulk read operations will read a
range of registers but some I2C/SPI devices have certain registers for
which a such a read operation will return data from an internal FIFO
instead. Add an explicit API to support bulk read without
From: Crestez Dan Leonard
The regmap API usually assumes that bulk read operations will read a
range of registers but some I2C/SPI devices have certain registers for
which a such a read operation will return data from an internal FIFO
instead. Add an explicit API to support bulk read without
10 matches
Mail list logo