On 03/13/2015 11:19 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 03/10/2015 10:05 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> This adds a Make include file which most selftests can then include to
>> get the run_tests logic.
>>
>> On its own this has the advantage of some reduction in repetition, and
>> also means the pass/fail
On 03/10/2015 10:05 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> This adds a Make include file which most selftests can then include to
> get the run_tests logic.
>
> On its own this has the advantage of some reduction in repetition, and
> also means the pass/fail message is defined in fewer places.
>
>
On 03/10/2015 10:05 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
This adds a Make include file which most selftests can then include to
get the run_tests logic.
On its own this has the advantage of some reduction in repetition, and
also means the pass/fail message is defined in fewer places.
However the
On 03/13/2015 11:19 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 03/10/2015 10:05 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
This adds a Make include file which most selftests can then include to
get the run_tests logic.
On its own this has the advantage of some reduction in repetition, and
also means the pass/fail message is
This adds a Make include file which most selftests can then include to
get the run_tests logic.
On its own this has the advantage of some reduction in repetition, and
also means the pass/fail message is defined in fewer places.
However the key advantage is it will allow us to implement install
This adds a Make include file which most selftests can then include to
get the run_tests logic.
On its own this has the advantage of some reduction in repetition, and
also means the pass/fail message is defined in fewer places.
However the key advantage is it will allow us to implement install
6 matches
Mail list logo
