On 20 June 2013 04:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Well, sentences that don't start from upper-case letters don't look like
> separate sentences
s/sequences/sentences for your initial mail.
I misunderstood it as, you want to name cpu{0|1|2} as CPU{1|2|3}..
Obviously sentences must start with
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 11:26:13 AM Xiaoguang Chen wrote:
> 2013/6/19 Viresh Kumar :
> > On 19 June 2013 08:43, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> On 19 June 2013 06:50, Xiaoguang Chen wrote:
> >>> 2013/6/19 Rafael J. Wysocki :
> >>
> > 2) Current governor is userspace, now cpu0 hotplugs in cpu3,
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 08:30:11 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 19 June 2013 06:50, Xiaoguang Chen wrote:
> > 2013/6/19 Rafael J. Wysocki :
> >> On Thursday, June 13, 2013 05:01:58 PM Xiaoguang Chen wrote:
> >>> cpufreq governor stop and start should be kept in sequence.
> >>> If not, there will
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 08:30:11 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 19 June 2013 06:50, Xiaoguang Chen chenxg.marv...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/6/19 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
On Thursday, June 13, 2013 05:01:58 PM Xiaoguang Chen wrote:
cpufreq governor stop and start should be kept in
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 11:26:13 AM Xiaoguang Chen wrote:
2013/6/19 Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org:
On 19 June 2013 08:43, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 19 June 2013 06:50, Xiaoguang Chen chenxg.marv...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/6/19 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
On 20 June 2013 04:19, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
Well, sentences that don't start from upper-case letters don't look like
separate sentences
s/sequences/sentences for your initial mail.
I misunderstood it as, you want to name cpu{0|1|2} as CPU{1|2|3}..
Obviously sentences must
2013/6/19 Viresh Kumar :
> On 19 June 2013 08:43, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 19 June 2013 06:50, Xiaoguang Chen wrote:
>>> 2013/6/19 Rafael J. Wysocki :
>>
> 2) Current governor is userspace, now cpu0 hotplugs in cpu3, it will
Can you please tell me what the above is supposed to
On 19 June 2013 08:43, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 19 June 2013 06:50, Xiaoguang Chen wrote:
>> 2013/6/19 Rafael J. Wysocki :
>
2) Current governor is userspace, now cpu0 hotplugs in cpu3, it will
>>>
>>> Can you please tell me what the above is supposed to mean? Is it supposed
>>> to
>>>
On 19 June 2013 06:50, Xiaoguang Chen wrote:
> 2013/6/19 Rafael J. Wysocki :
>>> 2) Current governor is userspace, now cpu0 hotplugs in cpu3, it will
>>
>> Can you please tell me what the above is supposed to mean? Is it supposed to
>> mean "the online of cpu3 is being run on cpu0" or something
On 19 June 2013 06:50, Xiaoguang Chen wrote:
> 2013/6/19 Rafael J. Wysocki :
>> On Thursday, June 13, 2013 05:01:58 PM Xiaoguang Chen wrote:
>>> cpufreq governor stop and start should be kept in sequence.
>>> If not, there will be unexpected behavior, for example:
>>>
>>> we have 4 cpus and
2013/6/19 Rafael J. Wysocki :
> On Thursday, June 13, 2013 05:01:58 PM Xiaoguang Chen wrote:
>> cpufreq governor stop and start should be kept in sequence.
>> If not, there will be unexpected behavior, for example:
>>
>> we have 4 cpus and policy->cpu=cpu0, cpu1/2/3 are linked to cpu0.
>
> Please
On Thursday, June 13, 2013 05:01:58 PM Xiaoguang Chen wrote:
> cpufreq governor stop and start should be kept in sequence.
> If not, there will be unexpected behavior, for example:
>
> we have 4 cpus and policy->cpu=cpu0, cpu1/2/3 are linked to cpu0.
Please spell cpus as "CPUs". And please
On Thursday, June 13, 2013 05:01:58 PM Xiaoguang Chen wrote:
cpufreq governor stop and start should be kept in sequence.
If not, there will be unexpected behavior, for example:
we have 4 cpus and policy-cpu=cpu0, cpu1/2/3 are linked to cpu0.
Please spell cpus as CPUs. And please start
2013/6/19 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
On Thursday, June 13, 2013 05:01:58 PM Xiaoguang Chen wrote:
cpufreq governor stop and start should be kept in sequence.
If not, there will be unexpected behavior, for example:
we have 4 cpus and policy-cpu=cpu0, cpu1/2/3 are linked to cpu0.
Please
On 19 June 2013 06:50, Xiaoguang Chen chenxg.marv...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/6/19 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
On Thursday, June 13, 2013 05:01:58 PM Xiaoguang Chen wrote:
cpufreq governor stop and start should be kept in sequence.
If not, there will be unexpected behavior, for example:
we
On 19 June 2013 06:50, Xiaoguang Chen chenxg.marv...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/6/19 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
2) Current governor is userspace, now cpu0 hotplugs in cpu3, it will
Can you please tell me what the above is supposed to mean? Is it supposed to
mean the online of cpu3 is being
On 19 June 2013 08:43, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 19 June 2013 06:50, Xiaoguang Chen chenxg.marv...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/6/19 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
2) Current governor is userspace, now cpu0 hotplugs in cpu3, it will
Can you please tell me what the above is
2013/6/19 Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org:
On 19 June 2013 08:43, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 19 June 2013 06:50, Xiaoguang Chen chenxg.marv...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/6/19 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
2) Current governor is userspace, now cpu0 hotplugs in cpu3, it
2013/6/13 Viresh Kumar :
> On 13 June 2013 14:31, Xiaoguang Chen wrote:
>> cpufreq governor stop and start should be kept in sequence.
>> If not, there will be unexpected behavior, for example:
>>
>> we have 4 cpus and policy->cpu=cpu0, cpu1/2/3 are linked to cpu0.
>> the normal sequence is as
On 13 June 2013 14:31, Xiaoguang Chen wrote:
> cpufreq governor stop and start should be kept in sequence.
> If not, there will be unexpected behavior, for example:
>
> we have 4 cpus and policy->cpu=cpu0, cpu1/2/3 are linked to cpu0.
> the normal sequence is as below:
>
> 1) Current governor is
cpufreq governor stop and start should be kept in sequence.
If not, there will be unexpected behavior, for example:
we have 4 cpus and policy->cpu=cpu0, cpu1/2/3 are linked to cpu0.
the normal sequence is as below:
1) Current governor is userspace, one application tries to set
governor to
cpufreq governor stop and start should be kept in sequence.
If not, there will be unexpected behavior, for example:
we have 4 cpus and policy-cpu=cpu0, cpu1/2/3 are linked to cpu0.
the normal sequence is as below:
1) Current governor is userspace, one application tries to set
governor to
On 13 June 2013 14:31, Xiaoguang Chen che...@marvell.com wrote:
cpufreq governor stop and start should be kept in sequence.
If not, there will be unexpected behavior, for example:
we have 4 cpus and policy-cpu=cpu0, cpu1/2/3 are linked to cpu0.
the normal sequence is as below:
1) Current
2013/6/13 Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org:
On 13 June 2013 14:31, Xiaoguang Chen che...@marvell.com wrote:
cpufreq governor stop and start should be kept in sequence.
If not, there will be unexpected behavior, for example:
we have 4 cpus and policy-cpu=cpu0, cpu1/2/3 are linked to cpu0.
24 matches
Mail list logo
