Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string

Hello Alexis and Arnaldo, I think this series is now good to go. Could you pick these? Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu for this series. Thank you, On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 01:07:30 +0100 Alexis Berlemont wrote: > Hi Masami, > > Many thanks for your

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string

Hello Alexis and Arnaldo, I think this series is now good to go. Could you pick these? Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu for this series. Thank you, On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 01:07:30 +0100 Alexis Berlemont wrote: > Hi Masami, > > Many thanks for your mail. > > Here is another patch set which tries

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string

Ravi Bangoria wrote: > > > On Wednesday 14 December 2016 01:06 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Alexis Berlemont wrote: > > > >> Hi Masami, > >> > >> Many thanks for your mail. > >> > >> Here is another patch set which tries to fix the points you mentioned: > >> > >> *

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string

Ravi Bangoria wrote: > > > On Wednesday 14 December 2016 01:06 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Alexis Berlemont wrote: > > > >> Hi Masami, > >> > >> Many thanks for your mail. > >> > >> Here is another patch set which tries to fix the points you mentioned: > >> > >> * Skip the arguments containing

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string

On Tuesday 24 January 2017 01:52 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Ravi Bangoria wrote: > >> >> On Wednesday 14 December 2016 01:06 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> * Alexis Berlemont wrote: >>> Hi Masami, Many thanks for your

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string

On Tuesday 24 January 2017 01:52 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Ravi Bangoria wrote: > >> >> On Wednesday 14 December 2016 01:06 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> * Alexis Berlemont wrote: >>> Hi Masami, Many thanks for your mail. Here is another patch set which tries to fix the

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string

* Ravi Bangoria wrote: > > > On Wednesday 14 December 2016 01:06 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Alexis Berlemont wrote: > > > >> Hi Masami, > >> > >> Many thanks for your mail. > >> > >> Here is another patch set which tries to fix

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string

* Ravi Bangoria wrote: > > > On Wednesday 14 December 2016 01:06 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Alexis Berlemont wrote: > > > >> Hi Masami, > >> > >> Many thanks for your mail. > >> > >> Here is another patch set which tries to fix the points you mentioned: > >> > >> * Skip the arguments

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string

On Wednesday 14 December 2016 01:06 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Alexis Berlemont wrote: > >> Hi Masami, >> >> Many thanks for your mail. >> >> Here is another patch set which tries to fix the points you mentioned: >> >> * Skip the arguments containing a constant

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string

On Wednesday 14 December 2016 01:06 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Alexis Berlemont wrote: > >> Hi Masami, >> >> Many thanks for your mail. >> >> Here is another patch set which tries to fix the points you mentioned: >> >> * Skip the arguments containing a constant ($123); >> * Review the code in

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string

On Wednesday 14 December 2016 01:06 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Alexis Berlemont wrote: > >> Hi Masami, >> >> Many thanks for your mail. >> >> Here is another patch set which tries to fix the points you mentioned: >> >> * Skip the arguments containing a constant

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string

On Wednesday 14 December 2016 01:06 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Alexis Berlemont wrote: > >> Hi Masami, >> >> Many thanks for your mail. >> >> Here is another patch set which tries to fix the points you mentioned: >> >> * Skip the arguments containing a constant ($123); >> * Review the code in

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string

* Alexis Berlemont wrote: > Hi Masami, > > Many thanks for your mail. > > Here is another patch set which tries to fix the points you mentioned: > > * Skip the arguments containing a constant ($123); > * Review the code in charge of the register renaming (search

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string

* Alexis Berlemont wrote: > Hi Masami, > > Many thanks for your mail. > > Here is another patch set which tries to fix the points you mentioned: > > * Skip the arguments containing a constant ($123); > * Review the code in charge of the register renaming (search for '%' > and parse it); >

[PATCH v5 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string

Hi Masami, Many thanks for your mail. Here is another patch set which tries to fix the points you mentioned: * Skip the arguments containing a constant ($123); * Review the code in charge of the register renaming (search for '%' and parse it); * Minor changes (print the argument in case of

[PATCH v5 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string

Hi Masami, Many thanks for your mail. Here is another patch set which tries to fix the points you mentioned: * Skip the arguments containing a constant ($123); * Review the code in charge of the register renaming (search for '%' and parse it); * Minor changes (print the argument in case of