Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hi Arnd! On Wed Dec 20 14:14:07 2017 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > If it will be still possible to build the binary kernel of the same > > size after the conversion, I'm in for testing, otherwise it will not > > fit into Flash any more... > > I think there is an increase in code size

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hi Arnd! On Wed Dec 20 14:14:07 2017 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > If it will be still possible to build the binary kernel of the same > > size after the conversion, I'm in for testing, otherwise it will not > > fit into Flash any more... > > I think there is an increase in code size that comes

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hi Linus, > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Lukasz Majewski > wrote: > >> On Wed Dec 13 08:34:22 2017 Linus Walleij > >> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Lukasz Majewski > >> > wrote: Out of curiosity: Liebherr is

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hi Linus, > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Lukasz Majewski > wrote: > >> On Wed Dec 13 08:34:22 2017 Linus Walleij > >> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Lukasz Majewski > >> > wrote: Out of curiosity: Liebherr is obviously doing heavy-duty > >> > industrial control systems.

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Alexander Sverdlin wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed Dec 20 13:50:28 2017 Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> I'm generally more interested in the multiplatform conversion than >> the DT conversion, and I think converting this one to

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hi Arnd, > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Linus Walleij > wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Lukasz Majewski > > wrote: > > > > > There is a point where supporting old board files will stand in > > the way and cost a lot in maintenance

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Alexander Sverdlin wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed Dec 20 13:50:28 2017 Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> I'm generally more interested in the multiplatform conversion than >> the DT conversion, and I think converting this one to multiplatform >> isn't actually that hard, and

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hi Arnd, > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Linus Walleij > wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Lukasz Majewski > > wrote: > > > > > There is a point where supporting old board files will stand in > > the way and cost a lot in maintenance (like moving drivers our > > of arch/arm, or

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hi! On Wed Dec 20 13:50:28 2017 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I'm generally more interested in the multiplatform conversion than > the DT conversion, and I think converting this one to multiplatform > isn't actually that hard, and doesn't have a significant risk for > regressions, the

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hi! On Wed Dec 20 13:50:28 2017 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I'm generally more interested in the multiplatform conversion than > the DT conversion, and I think converting this one to multiplatform > isn't actually that hard, and doesn't have a significant risk for > regressions, the main work is to

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: It would also be helpful to test whether the

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: It would also be helpful to test whether the -march=armv4t/--fix-v4bx workaround produces working binaries

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > There is a point where supporting old board files will stand in > the way and cost a lot in maintenance (like moving drivers our > of

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > There is a point where supporting old board files will stand in > the way and cost a lot in maintenance (like moving drivers our > of arch/arm, or modernizing misc subsystems).

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Lukasz Majewski >>> wrote: >>> >> >> We also need to think about upholding support in GCC for >>>

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Lukasz Majewski >>> wrote: >>> >> >> We also need to think about upholding support in GCC for >>> >> >> ARMv4(t) for the foreseeable future if

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: >> On Wed Dec 13 08:34:22 2017 Linus Walleij >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Lukasz Majewski >> > wrote: Out of curiosity: Liebherr is obviously doing heavy-duty >> >

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: >> On Wed Dec 13 08:34:22 2017 Linus Walleij >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Lukasz Majewski >> > wrote: Out of curiosity: Liebherr is obviously doing heavy-duty >> > industrial control systems. Likewise Hartley is doing

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hi Arnd, > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:36 PM, Lukasz Majewski > wrote: > > Hi Arnd, > > > >> Hi! > >> > >> On Mon Dec 18 12:55:40 2017 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> > > GCC 7.2 is working > >> > > >> > Ah wait, this is still for ep93xx, which is always at least >

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hi Arnd, > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:36 PM, Lukasz Majewski > wrote: > > Hi Arnd, > > > >> Hi! > >> > >> On Mon Dec 18 12:55:40 2017 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> > > GCC 7.2 is working > >> > > >> > Ah wait, this is still for ep93xx, which is always at least > >> > armv4t, right? So it

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:36 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Hi Arnd, > >> Hi! >> >> On Mon Dec 18 12:55:40 2017 Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > > GCC 7.2 is working >> > >> > Ah wait, this is still for ep93xx, which is always at least armv4t, >> > right? So it won't have a

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:36 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Hi Arnd, > >> Hi! >> >> On Mon Dec 18 12:55:40 2017 Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > > GCC 7.2 is working >> > >> > Ah wait, this is still for ep93xx, which is always at least armv4t, >> > right? So it won't have a problem with the armv4

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hi Arnd, > Hi! > > On Mon Dec 18 12:55:40 2017 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > GCC 7.2 is working > > > > Ah wait, this is still for ep93xx, which is always at least armv4t, > > right? So it won't have a problem with the armv4 deprecation > > anyway, even > > Correct. Maybe a

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hi Arnd, > Hi! > > On Mon Dec 18 12:55:40 2017 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > GCC 7.2 is working > > > > Ah wait, this is still for ep93xx, which is always at least armv4t, > > right? So it won't have a problem with the armv4 deprecation > > anyway, even > > Correct. Maybe a bit off topic

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hi! On Mon Dec 18 12:55:40 2017 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > GCC 7.2 is working > > Ah wait, this is still for ep93xx, which is always at least armv4t, > right? So it won't have a problem with the armv4 deprecation anyway, even Correct. -- Alex.

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hi! On Mon Dec 18 12:55:40 2017 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > GCC 7.2 is working > > Ah wait, this is still for ep93xx, which is always at least armv4t, > right? So it won't have a problem with the armv4 deprecation anyway, even Correct. -- Alex.

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Hi Arnd, > >> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Lukasz Majewski >> wrote: >> >> >> We also need to think about upholding support in GCC for >> >> >> ARMv4(t) for the foreseeable future if there is a big web

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Hi Arnd, > >> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Lukasz Majewski >> wrote: >> >> >> We also need to think about upholding support in GCC for >> >> >> ARMv4(t) for the foreseeable future if there is a big web of >> >> >> random deeply

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hi Arnd, > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Lukasz Majewski > wrote: > >> >> We also need to think about upholding support in GCC for > >> >> ARMv4(t) for the foreseeable future if there is a big web of > >> >> random deeply embedded systems out there that will need > >> >>

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hi Arnd, > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Lukasz Majewski > wrote: > >> >> We also need to think about upholding support in GCC for > >> >> ARMv4(t) for the foreseeable future if there is a big web of > >> >> random deeply embedded systems out there that will need > >> >> updates. > >> > >

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: >> >> We also need to think about upholding support in GCC for >> >> ARMv4(t) for the foreseeable future if there is a big web of >> >> random deeply embedded systems out there that will need >> >> updates. >> > >> > But we

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: >> >> We also need to think about upholding support in GCC for >> >> ARMv4(t) for the foreseeable future if there is a big web of >> >> random deeply embedded systems out there that will need >> >> updates. >> > >> > But we should definitely

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hi Arnd, > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Alexander Sverdlin > wrote: > > On Wed Dec 13 08:34:22 2017 Linus Walleij > > wrote: > >> Arnd has been nudging me to do DT conversion for EP93xx > >> so if there are many active industrial

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hi Arnd, > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Alexander Sverdlin > wrote: > > On Wed Dec 13 08:34:22 2017 Linus Walleij > > wrote: > >> Arnd has been nudging me to do DT conversion for EP93xx > >> so if there are many active industrial users of these > >> I should prioritize it, because these

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Alexander Sverdlin wrote: > On Wed Dec 13 08:34:22 2017 Linus Walleij wrote: >> Arnd has been nudging me to do DT conversion for EP93xx >> so if there are many active industrial users of these >> I should

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Alexander Sverdlin wrote: > On Wed Dec 13 08:34:22 2017 Linus Walleij wrote: >> Arnd has been nudging me to do DT conversion for EP93xx >> so if there are many active industrial users of these >> I should prioritize it, because these things have 20+ years >>

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hi Alexander, Linus > Hello Linus! > > On Wed Dec 13 08:34:22 2017 Linus Walleij > wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Lukasz Majewski > > wrote: Out of curiosity: Liebherr is obviously doing heavy-duty > > industrial control systems. Likewise

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hi Alexander, Linus > Hello Linus! > > On Wed Dec 13 08:34:22 2017 Linus Walleij > wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Lukasz Majewski > > wrote: Out of curiosity: Liebherr is obviously doing heavy-duty > > industrial control systems. Likewise Hartley is doing similar > > business

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hello Linus! On Wed Dec 13 08:34:22 2017 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Out of curiosity: Liebherr is obviously doing heavy-duty industrial > control systems. Likewise Hartley is doing similar business

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

Hello Linus! On Wed Dec 13 08:34:22 2017 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Out of curiosity: Liebherr is obviously doing heavy-duty industrial > control systems. Likewise Hartley is doing similar business over > at Vision Engravings. > > Is the

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > This patch series adds support for Liebherr's BK3 board, being > a derivative of TS72XX design. All looks good. Acked-by: Linus Walleij Out of curiosity: Liebherr is obviously doing heavy-duty

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > This patch series adds support for Liebherr's BK3 board, being > a derivative of TS72XX design. All looks good. Acked-by: Linus Walleij Out of curiosity: Liebherr is obviously doing heavy-duty industrial control systems. Likewise

RE: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Monday, December 11, 2017 4:36 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > This patch series adds support for Liebherr's BK3 board, being a derivative > of TS72XX design. > > This patchset consists of following patches: > > - ts72xx.[c|h] cosmetic cleanup/improvement > - Rewrite ts72xx.c to be reusable by

RE: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

On Monday, December 11, 2017 4:36 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > This patch series adds support for Liebherr's BK3 board, being a derivative > of TS72XX design. > > This patchset consists of following patches: > > - ts72xx.[c|h] cosmetic cleanup/improvement > - Rewrite ts72xx.c to be reusable by

[PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

This patch series adds support for Liebherr's BK3 board, being a derivative of TS72XX design. This patchset consists of following patches: - ts72xx.[c|h] cosmetic cleanup/improvement - Rewrite ts72xx.c to be reusable by bk3 - The Liebherr's BK3 board has been added with re-using code of

[PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board

This patch series adds support for Liebherr's BK3 board, being a derivative of TS72XX design. This patchset consists of following patches: - ts72xx.[c|h] cosmetic cleanup/improvement - Rewrite ts72xx.c to be reusable by bk3 - The Liebherr's BK3 board has been added with re-using code of