On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:28:43AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:05:09AM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:14:14PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > [..]
> > > Please let me know if there are any issues!
> >
> > I found no issues
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:05:09AM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:14:14PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > [..]
> > Please let me know if there are any issues!
>
> I found no issues in my tests. Is this the final state ? If yes, I'm
> going to apply it to
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:14:14PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> [..]
> Please let me know if there are any issues!
I found no issues in my tests. Is this the final state ? If yes, I'm
going to apply it to mips-next.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 09:04:42AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 12:14 AM Nathan Chancellor
> wrote:
>
> > Patch 1 adds ld.lld support to Kconfig so that we can avoid certain
> > ld.bfd checks.
> >
>
> Is it possible to introduce and add LD_IS_BFD Kconfig for ld.bfd in
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 12:14 AM Nathan Chancellor
wrote:
> Patch 1 adds ld.lld support to Kconfig so that we can avoid certain
> ld.bfd checks.
>
Is it possible to introduce and add LD_IS_BFD Kconfig for ld.bfd in this series?
Most people agreed on this name AFAICS.
What do people think?
-
Hi all,
This series allows ld.lld to properly and completely link the MIPS vDSO.
Patch 1 adds ld.lld support to Kconfig so that we can avoid certain
ld.bfd checks.
Patch 2 moves disabling of the VDSO to Kconfig. This allows us to avoid
a warning with LD=ld.lld during the clean phase, when we do
6 matches
Mail list logo
