On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 3:02 PM Sinan Kaya wrote:
>
> On 4/14/2019 11:55 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Thanks! This looks good to me. For the series:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook
> >
> > Andrew, can you take these from lkml, or should the series get resent
> > directly to you? I think you might be th
On 4/14/2019 11:55 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
Thanks! This looks good to me. For the series:
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook
Andrew, can you take these from lkml, or should the series get resent
directly to you? I think you might be the best to carry this?
Where do we stand on this?
Anything for me to do,
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 3:44 PM Sinan Kaya wrote:
>
> CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL has been designed to just enable Kconfig options.
> Kernel code generatoin should not depend on CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL.
>
> Proposed alternative plan: let's add a new symbol, something like
> DEBUG_MISC ("Miscellaneous debug co
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL has been designed to just enable Kconfig options.
Kernel code generatoin should not depend on CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL.
Proposed alternative plan: let's add a new symbol, something like
DEBUG_MISC ("Miscellaneous debug code that should be under a more
specific debug option but isn't
4 matches
Mail list logo