On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 04:48:54PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 19 May 2017, at 16:28, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:37:38PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
> >>> As you say, there is no functional change but the helper name is vague
> >>> and gives no hint to what's it's checking for.
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 04:48:54PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 19 May 2017, at 16:28, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:37:38PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
> >>> As you say, there is no functional change but the helper name is vague
> >>> and gives no hint to what's it's checking for.
On 19 May 2017, at 16:28, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:37:38PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
>>> As you say, there is no functional change but the helper name is vague
>>> and gives no hint to what's it's checking for. It's somewhat tolerable as
>>> it is as it's obvious what is being
On 19 May 2017, at 16:28, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:37:38PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
>>> As you say, there is no functional change but the helper name is vague
>>> and gives no hint to what's it's checking for. It's somewhat tolerable as
>>> it is as it's obvious what is being
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:37:38PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
> > As you say, there is no functional change but the helper name is vague
> > and gives no hint to what's it's checking for. It's somewhat tolerable as
> > it is as it's obvious what is being checked but the same is not true with
> > the
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:37:38PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
> > As you say, there is no functional change but the helper name is vague
> > and gives no hint to what's it's checking for. It's somewhat tolerable as
> > it is as it's obvious what is being checked but the same is not true with
> > the
On 19 May 2017, at 12:02, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 06:43:37PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> On 04/21/2017 09:34 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> On 04/21/2017 02:17 AM, Zi Yan wrote:
From: Naoya Horiguchi
Introduce a separate
On 19 May 2017, at 12:02, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 06:43:37PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> On 04/21/2017 09:34 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> On 04/21/2017 02:17 AM, Zi Yan wrote:
From: Naoya Horiguchi
Introduce a separate check routine related to
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 06:43:37PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 04/21/2017 09:34 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > On 04/21/2017 02:17 AM, Zi Yan wrote:
> >> From: Naoya Horiguchi
> >>
> >> Introduce a separate check routine related to MPOL_MF_INVERT flag.
> >>
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 06:43:37PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 04/21/2017 09:34 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > On 04/21/2017 02:17 AM, Zi Yan wrote:
> >> From: Naoya Horiguchi
> >>
> >> Introduce a separate check routine related to MPOL_MF_INVERT flag.
> >> This patch just does
On 04/21/2017 09:34 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 04/21/2017 02:17 AM, Zi Yan wrote:
>> From: Naoya Horiguchi
>>
>> Introduce a separate check routine related to MPOL_MF_INVERT flag.
>> This patch just does cleanup, no behavioral change.
>
> Can you please send it
On 04/21/2017 09:34 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 04/21/2017 02:17 AM, Zi Yan wrote:
>> From: Naoya Horiguchi
>>
>> Introduce a separate check routine related to MPOL_MF_INVERT flag.
>> This patch just does cleanup, no behavioral change.
>
> Can you please send it separately first, this
On 04/21/2017 02:17 AM, Zi Yan wrote:
> From: Naoya Horiguchi
>
> Introduce a separate check routine related to MPOL_MF_INVERT flag.
> This patch just does cleanup, no behavioral change.
Can you please send it separately first, this should be debated
and merged
On 04/21/2017 02:17 AM, Zi Yan wrote:
> From: Naoya Horiguchi
>
> Introduce a separate check routine related to MPOL_MF_INVERT flag.
> This patch just does cleanup, no behavioral change.
Can you please send it separately first, this should be debated
and merged quickly and not hang on to the
From: Naoya Horiguchi
Introduce a separate check routine related to MPOL_MF_INVERT flag.
This patch just does cleanup, no behavioral change.
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 16 +++-
1 file changed, 11
From: Naoya Horiguchi
Introduce a separate check routine related to MPOL_MF_INVERT flag.
This patch just does cleanup, no behavioral change.
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 16 +++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c
16 matches
Mail list logo