On 13/08/20 20:16, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Valentin Schneider wrote:
>
>> The ARM-specific GMC level is meant to be built using the thread sibling
>> mask, but no devicetree in arch/arm/boot/dts uses the 'thread' cpu-map
>> binding. With SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN gone, this topology level can be
>>
* Valentin Schneider wrote:
> The ARM-specific GMC level is meant to be built using the thread sibling
> mask, but no devicetree in arch/arm/boot/dts uses the 'thread' cpu-map
> binding. With SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN gone, this topology level can be
> removed, at which point ARM no longer benefits
The ARM-specific GMC level is meant to be built using the thread sibling
mask, but no devicetree in arch/arm/boot/dts uses the 'thread' cpu-map
binding. With SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN gone, this topology level can be
removed, at which point ARM no longer benefits from having a custom defined
topology
3 matches
Mail list logo