Re: [PATCH v5 02/17] ARM: Revert back to default scheduler topology.

2020-08-13 Thread Valentin Schneider
On 13/08/20 20:16, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Valentin Schneider wrote: > >> The ARM-specific GMC level is meant to be built using the thread sibling >> mask, but no devicetree in arch/arm/boot/dts uses the 'thread' cpu-map >> binding. With SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN gone, this topology level can be >>

Re: [PATCH v5 02/17] ARM: Revert back to default scheduler topology.

2020-08-13 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Valentin Schneider wrote: > The ARM-specific GMC level is meant to be built using the thread sibling > mask, but no devicetree in arch/arm/boot/dts uses the 'thread' cpu-map > binding. With SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN gone, this topology level can be > removed, at which point ARM no longer benefits

[PATCH v5 02/17] ARM: Revert back to default scheduler topology.

2020-08-12 Thread Valentin Schneider
The ARM-specific GMC level is meant to be built using the thread sibling mask, but no devicetree in arch/arm/boot/dts uses the 'thread' cpu-map binding. With SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN gone, this topology level can be removed, at which point ARM no longer benefits from having a custom defined topology