* Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2014/07/16 22:28), Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >
> >> (2014/07/15 16:16), Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 13:19 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >>>
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu
> > Reported-by:
(2014/07/16 22:28), Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
>> (2014/07/15 16:16), Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 13:19 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu
> Reported-by: Tony Luck
> Tested-by: Tony Luck
>
(2014/07/16 22:28), Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Masami Hiramatsu masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com wrote:
(2014/07/15 16:16), Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 13:19 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com
Reported-by: Tony
* Masami Hiramatsu masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com wrote:
(2014/07/16 22:28), Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Masami Hiramatsu masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com wrote:
(2014/07/15 16:16), Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 13:19 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Signed-off-by:
* Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2014/07/15 16:16), Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 13:19 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >
> >>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu
> >>> Reported-by: Tony Luck
> >>> Tested-by: Tony Luck
> >>> Cc: Michael Ellerman
> >>
> >> Tested-by:
* Masami Hiramatsu masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com wrote:
(2014/07/15 16:16), Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 13:19 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com
Reported-by: Tony Luck tony.l...@gmail.com
Tested-by:
(2014/07/15 16:16), Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 13:19 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
>>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu
>>> Reported-by: Tony Luck
>>> Tested-by: Tony Luck
>>> Cc: Michael Ellerman
>>
>> Tested-by: Michael Ellerman
>> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 13:19 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu
> > Reported-by: Tony Luck
> > Tested-by: Tony Luck
> > Cc: Michael Ellerman
>
> Tested-by: Michael Ellerman
> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman (for powerpc)
>
> Ben, can you take this in your tree?
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 13:19 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com
Reported-by: Tony Luck tony.l...@gmail.com
Tested-by: Tony Luck tony.l...@intel.com
Cc: Michael Ellerman m...@ellerman.id.au
Tested-by: Michael Ellerman
(2014/07/15 16:16), Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 13:19 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com
Reported-by: Tony Luck tony.l...@gmail.com
Tested-by: Tony Luck tony.l...@intel.com
Cc: Michael Ellerman
On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 07:00 +, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On ia64 and ppc64, the function pointer does not point the
> entry address of the function, but the address of function
> discriptor (which contains the entry address and misc
> data.) Since the kprobes passes the function pointer stored
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 11:24 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2014/07/15 11:11), Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 10:17 -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Masami Hiramatsu
> >> wrote:
> >>> Ping?
> >>>
> >>> This patch can be applied without 1/2, and
(2014/07/15 11:11), Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 10:17 -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Masami Hiramatsu
>> wrote:
>>> Ping?
>>>
>>> This patch can be applied without 1/2, and will fix ia64/ppc64 problem.
>>
>> Is somebody going to push this upstream?
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 10:17 -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Masami Hiramatsu
> wrote:
> > Ping?
> >
> > This patch can be applied without 1/2, and will fix ia64/ppc64 problem.
>
> Is somebody going to push this upstream? Another week has gone by,
> we are at -rc5, and
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Masami Hiramatsu
wrote:
> Ping?
>
> This patch can be applied without 1/2, and will fix ia64/ppc64 problem.
Is somebody going to push this upstream? Another week has gone by,
we are at -rc5, and I'm still seeing the
Failed to find blacklist a0010133b150
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Masami Hiramatsu
masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com wrote:
Ping?
This patch can be applied without 1/2, and will fix ia64/ppc64 problem.
Is somebody going to push this upstream? Another week has gone by,
we are at -rc5, and I'm still seeing the
Failed to find
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 10:17 -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Masami Hiramatsu
masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com wrote:
Ping?
This patch can be applied without 1/2, and will fix ia64/ppc64 problem.
Is somebody going to push this upstream? Another week has gone by,
(2014/07/15 11:11), Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 10:17 -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Masami Hiramatsu
masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com wrote:
Ping?
This patch can be applied without 1/2, and will fix ia64/ppc64 problem.
Is somebody going to push
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 11:24 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
(2014/07/15 11:11), Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 10:17 -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Masami Hiramatsu
masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com wrote:
Ping?
This patch can be applied without
On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 07:00 +, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
On ia64 and ppc64, the function pointer does not point the
entry address of the function, but the address of function
discriptor (which contains the entry address and misc
data.) Since the kprobes passes the function pointer stored
by
Ping?
This patch can be applied without 1/2, and will fix ia64/ppc64 problem.
Thank you,
(2014/07/02 16:00), Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On ia64 and ppc64, the function pointer does not point the
> entry address of the function, but the address of function
> discriptor (which contains the entry
Ping?
This patch can be applied without 1/2, and will fix ia64/ppc64 problem.
Thank you,
(2014/07/02 16:00), Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
On ia64 and ppc64, the function pointer does not point the
entry address of the function, but the address of function
discriptor (which contains the entry
On ia64 and ppc64, the function pointer does not point the
entry address of the function, but the address of function
discriptor (which contains the entry address and misc
data.) Since the kprobes passes the function pointer stored
by NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() to kallsyms_lookup_size_offset() for
On ia64 and ppc64, the function pointer does not point the
entry address of the function, but the address of function
discriptor (which contains the entry address and misc
data.) Since the kprobes passes the function pointer stored
by NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() to kallsyms_lookup_size_offset() for
24 matches
Mail list logo
