On Thursday, February 18, 2016 10:01:29 AM Zhu Guihua wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On 02/03/2016 08:02 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Zhu Guihua
> > wrote:
> >> On 01/25/2016 02:12 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
> >>> Hi Rafael, Len,
>
On Thursday, February 18, 2016 10:01:29 AM Zhu Guihua wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On 02/03/2016 08:02 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Zhu Guihua
> > wrote:
> >> On 01/25/2016 02:12 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
> >>> Hi Rafael, Len,
> >>>
> >>> Would you please
Hi Rafael,
On 02/03/2016 08:02 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Zhu Guihua wrote:
On 01/25/2016 02:12 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
Hi Rafael, Len,
Would you please help to review the ACPI part of this patch-set ?
Can anyone help to
Hi Rafael,
On 02/03/2016 08:02 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Zhu Guihua wrote:
On 01/25/2016 02:12 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
Hi Rafael, Len,
Would you please help to review the ACPI part of this patch-set ?
Can anyone help to review this?
I'm planning to
Hello,
This also made workqueue blow up when delayed modding races cpu
offlining.
http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1454424264.11183.46.ca...@gmail.com
I'll work around it from the queueing path but it'd be great if the
mapping can be made stable sooner than later.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Zhu Guihua wrote:
>
> On 01/25/2016 02:12 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rafael, Len,
>>
>> Would you please help to review the ACPI part of this patch-set ?
>
>
> Can anyone help to review this?
I'm planning to look into this more thoroughly in the next few
On 01/25/2016 02:12 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
Hi Rafael, Len,
Would you please help to review the ACPI part of this patch-set ?
Can anyone help to review this?
Cc tj:
Can you add acked-by into this patchset?
Thanks.
Thanks.
On 01/25/2016 02:08 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
[Problem]
cpuid <->
On 01/25/2016 02:12 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
Hi Rafael, Len,
Would you please help to review the ACPI part of this patch-set ?
Can anyone help to review this?
Cc tj:
Can you add acked-by into this patchset?
Thanks.
Thanks.
On 01/25/2016 02:08 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
[Problem]
cpuid <->
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Zhu Guihua wrote:
>
> On 01/25/2016 02:12 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rafael, Len,
>>
>> Would you please help to review the ACPI part of this patch-set ?
>
>
> Can anyone help to review this?
I'm planning to look into this more
Hello,
This also made workqueue blow up when delayed modding races cpu
offlining.
http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1454424264.11183.46.ca...@gmail.com
I'll work around it from the queueing path but it'd be great if the
mapping can be made stable sooner than later.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Hi Rafael, Len,
Would you please help to review the ACPI part of this patch-set ?
Thanks.
On 01/25/2016 02:08 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
[Problem]
cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is firstly established at boot time. And workqueue
caches
the mapping in wq_numa_possible_cpumask in wq_numa_init() at boot
[Problem]
cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is firstly established at boot time. And workqueue
caches
the mapping in wq_numa_possible_cpumask in wq_numa_init() at boot time.
When doing node online/offline, cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is
established/destroyed,
which means, cpuid <-> nodeid mapping will
[Problem]
cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is firstly established at boot time. And workqueue
caches
the mapping in wq_numa_possible_cpumask in wq_numa_init() at boot time.
When doing node online/offline, cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is
established/destroyed,
which means, cpuid <-> nodeid mapping will
Hi Rafael, Len,
Would you please help to review the ACPI part of this patch-set ?
Thanks.
On 01/25/2016 02:08 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
[Problem]
cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is firstly established at boot time. And workqueue
caches
the mapping in wq_numa_possible_cpumask in wq_numa_init() at boot
14 matches
Mail list logo