Re: [PATCH v6 01/10] tracing: Add support for SOFT_DISABLE to syscall events

(2013/08/23 8:27), Tom Zanussi wrote: > The original SOFT_DISABLE patches didn't add support for soft disable > of syscall events; this adds it and paves the way for future patches > allowing triggers to be added to syscall events, since triggers are > built on top of SOFT_DISABLE. > > Add an

Re: [PATCH v6 01/10] tracing: Add support for SOFT_DISABLE to syscall events

(2013/08/23 8:27), Tom Zanussi wrote: The original SOFT_DISABLE patches didn't add support for soft disable of syscall events; this adds it and paves the way for future patches allowing triggers to be added to syscall events, since triggers are built on top of SOFT_DISABLE. Add an array of

[PATCH v6 01/10] tracing: Add support for SOFT_DISABLE to syscall events

The original SOFT_DISABLE patches didn't add support for soft disable of syscall events; this adds it and paves the way for future patches allowing triggers to be added to syscall events, since triggers are built on top of SOFT_DISABLE. Add an array of ftrace_event_file pointers indexed by

[PATCH v6 01/10] tracing: Add support for SOFT_DISABLE to syscall events

The original SOFT_DISABLE patches didn't add support for soft disable of syscall events; this adds it and paves the way for future patches allowing triggers to be added to syscall events, since triggers are built on top of SOFT_DISABLE. Add an array of ftrace_event_file pointers indexed by