On Tue, May 01 2018 at 10:42 -0600, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
Yes, this is incorrect in its current form. This is what it should be -
static int find_match(const struct tcs_group *tcs, const struct tcs_cmd
*cmd,
On Tue, May 01 2018 at 10:42 -0600, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
Yes, this is incorrect in its current form. This is what it should be -
static int find_match(const struct tcs_group *tcs, const struct tcs_cmd
*cmd,
int len)
{
Hi Lina,
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 10:10:10AM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27 2018 at 17:24 -0600, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke
> > wrote:
> > > > > Am I getting something wrong here?
> > > >
> > > > The
Hi Lina,
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 10:10:10AM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27 2018 at 17:24 -0600, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke
> > wrote:
> > > > > Am I getting something wrong here?
> > > >
> > > > The for_each_set_bit()
Hi,
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
> Yes, this is incorrect in its current form. This is what it should be -
>
> static int find_match(const struct tcs_group *tcs, const struct tcs_cmd
> *cmd,
> int len)
> {
>int i, j;
>
>
Hi,
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
> Yes, this is incorrect in its current form. This is what it should be -
>
> static int find_match(const struct tcs_group *tcs, const struct tcs_cmd
> *cmd,
> int len)
> {
>int i, j;
>
>/* Check for
On Fri, Apr 27 2018 at 17:24 -0600, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Am I getting something wrong here?
The for_each_set_bit() should increment the 'i' and we would attempt to
compare the first address in the request with
On Fri, Apr 27 2018 at 17:24 -0600, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Am I getting something wrong here?
The for_each_set_bit() should increment the 'i' and we would attempt to
compare the first address in the request with the next command
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>> > Am I getting something wrong here?
>>
>> The for_each_set_bit() should increment the 'i' and we would attempt to
>> compare the first address in the request with the next command in the
>> TCS cache. If they
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>> > Am I getting something wrong here?
>>
>> The for_each_set_bit() should increment the 'i' and we would attempt to
>> compare the first address in the request with the next command in the
>> TCS cache. If they don't match we repeat
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 03:32:01PM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27 2018 at 14:06 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 01:45:59PM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 27 2018 at 12:40 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:39:43AM
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 03:32:01PM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27 2018 at 14:06 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 01:45:59PM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 27 2018 at 12:40 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:39:43AM
On Fri, Apr 27 2018 at 14:06 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 01:45:59PM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27 2018 at 12:40 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:39:43AM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 25 2018 at 15:41 -0600, Matthias
On Fri, Apr 27 2018 at 14:06 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 01:45:59PM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27 2018 at 12:40 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:39:43AM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 25 2018 at 15:41 -0600, Matthias
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 01:45:59PM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27 2018 at 12:40 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:39:43AM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 25 2018 at 15:41 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:16:30PM
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 01:45:59PM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27 2018 at 12:40 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:39:43AM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 25 2018 at 15:41 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:16:30PM
On Fri, Apr 27 2018 at 12:40 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:39:43AM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25 2018 at 15:41 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:16:30PM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> > Sleep and wake requests are sent when the
On Fri, Apr 27 2018 at 12:40 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:39:43AM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25 2018 at 15:41 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:16:30PM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> > Sleep and wake requests are sent when the
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:39:43AM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25 2018 at 15:41 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:16:30PM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> > > Sleep and wake requests are sent when the application processor
> > > subsystem of the SoC is entering deep
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:39:43AM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25 2018 at 15:41 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:16:30PM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> > > Sleep and wake requests are sent when the application processor
> > > subsystem of the SoC is entering deep
On Wed, Apr 25 2018 at 15:41 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:16:30PM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
Sleep and wake requests are sent when the application processor
subsystem of the SoC is entering deep sleep states like in suspend.
These requests help lower the system power
On Wed, Apr 25 2018 at 15:41 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:16:30PM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
Sleep and wake requests are sent when the application processor
subsystem of the SoC is entering deep sleep states like in suspend.
These requests help lower the system power
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:16:30PM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> Sleep and wake requests are sent when the application processor
> subsystem of the SoC is entering deep sleep states like in suspend.
> These requests help lower the system power requirements when the
> resources are not in use.
>
>
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:16:30PM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> Sleep and wake requests are sent when the application processor
> subsystem of the SoC is entering deep sleep states like in suspend.
> These requests help lower the system power requirements when the
> resources are not in use.
>
>
Sleep and wake requests are sent when the application processor
subsystem of the SoC is entering deep sleep states like in suspend.
These requests help lower the system power requirements when the
resources are not in use.
Sleep and wake requests are written to the TCS slots but are not
triggered
Sleep and wake requests are sent when the application processor
subsystem of the SoC is entering deep sleep states like in suspend.
These requests help lower the system power requirements when the
resources are not in use.
Sleep and wake requests are written to the TCS slots but are not
triggered
26 matches
Mail list logo