On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 9:38 AM Arpitha Raghunandan <98.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 14/11/20 5:44 am, Marco Elver wrote:
> >
> > Arpitha: Do you want to send v7, but with the following modifications
> > from what I proposed? Assuming nobody objects.
> >
> > 1. Remove the num_params counter and
On 14/11/20 5:44 am, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 23:37, David Gow wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 6:31 PM Marco Elver wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 01:17PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 8:37 PM Marco Elver wrote:
>>> [...]
>> (It also
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 23:37, David Gow wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 6:31 PM Marco Elver wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 01:17PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 8:37 PM Marco Elver wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > > (It also might be a little tricky with the current
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 6:31 PM Marco Elver wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 01:17PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 8:37 PM Marco Elver wrote:
> [...]
> > > > (It also might be a little tricky with the current implementation to
> > > > produce the test plan, as the
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 01:17PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 8:37 PM Marco Elver wrote:
[...]
> > > (It also might be a little tricky with the current implementation to
> > > produce the test plan, as the parameters come from a generator, and I
> > > don't think there's a way
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 8:37 PM Marco Elver wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 04:18PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:55 AM Bird, Tim wrote:
> [...]
> > > > kunit_tool has a bug when parsing the comments / diagnostic lines,
> > > > which requires a ": " to be present.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 04:18PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:55 AM Bird, Tim wrote:
[...]
> > > kunit_tool has a bug when parsing the comments / diagnostic lines,
> > > which requires a ": " to be present. This is a bug, which is being
> > > fixed[1], so while it's _nice_
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:55 AM Bird, Tim wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Gow
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 1:02 AM Bird, Tim wrote:
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: David Gow
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 2:49 PM Arpitha
> -Original Message-
> From: David Gow
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 1:02 AM Bird, Tim wrote:
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: David Gow
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 2:49 PM Arpitha Raghunandan <98.a...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 07/11/20 3:36 pm,
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 1:02 AM Bird, Tim wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Gow
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 2:49 PM Arpitha Raghunandan <98.a...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 07/11/20 3:36 pm, Marco Elver wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 at 05:58, David Gow
> -Original Message-
> From: David Gow
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 2:49 PM Arpitha Raghunandan <98.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 07/11/20 3:36 pm, Marco Elver wrote:
> > > On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 at 05:58, David Gow wrote:
> > >> On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 3:22 AM Arpitha Raghunandan
On 10/11/20 10:11 pm, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 17:32, Arpitha Raghunandan <98.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/11/20 4:05 pm, Marco Elver wrote:
>>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 08:21, David Gow wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> The previous attempt [1] at something similar failed
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 17:32, Arpitha Raghunandan <98.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/11/20 4:05 pm, Marco Elver wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 08:21, David Gow wrote:
> > [...]
>
> The previous attempt [1] at something similar failed because it seems
> we'd need to teach
On 10/11/20 4:05 pm, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 08:21, David Gow wrote:
> [...]
The previous attempt [1] at something similar failed because it seems
we'd need to teach kunit-tool new tricks [2], too.
[1]
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 08:21, David Gow wrote:
[...]
> > >
> > > The previous attempt [1] at something similar failed because it seems
> > > we'd need to teach kunit-tool new tricks [2], too.
> > > [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201105195503.ga2399...@elver.google.com
> > > [2]
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 2:49 PM Arpitha Raghunandan <98.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 07/11/20 3:36 pm, Marco Elver wrote:
> > On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 at 05:58, David Gow wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 3:22 AM Arpitha Raghunandan <98.a...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Implementation of
On 07/11/20 3:36 pm, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 at 05:58, David Gow wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 3:22 AM Arpitha Raghunandan <98.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Implementation of support for parameterized testing in KUnit.
>>> This approach requires the creation of a test case
On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 at 05:58, David Gow wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 3:22 AM Arpitha Raghunandan <98.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Implementation of support for parameterized testing in KUnit.
> > This approach requires the creation of a test case using the
> > KUNIT_CASE_PARAM macro that
On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 3:22 AM Arpitha Raghunandan <98.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Implementation of support for parameterized testing in KUnit.
> This approach requires the creation of a test case using the
> KUNIT_CASE_PARAM macro that accepts a generator function as input.
> This generator
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 20:22, Arpitha Raghunandan <98.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Implementation of support for parameterized testing in KUnit.
> This approach requires the creation of a test case using the
> KUNIT_CASE_PARAM macro that accepts a generator function as input.
> This generator function
Implementation of support for parameterized testing in KUnit.
This approach requires the creation of a test case using the
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM macro that accepts a generator function as input.
This generator function should return the next parameter given the
previous parameter in parameterized
21 matches
Mail list logo
