On 27/06/16 18:07, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 27/06/16 17:29, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
[...]
acpi_disabled - acpi_disabled - acpi_disabled everywhere :/
The enable-method approach is not straightforward and now it is polluted
by acpi-disabled.
So IIUC,
smp_init_cpus (contains acpi_disabled)
On 27/06/16 18:07, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 27/06/16 17:29, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
[...]
acpi_disabled - acpi_disabled - acpi_disabled everywhere :/
The enable-method approach is not straightforward and now it is polluted
by acpi-disabled.
So IIUC,
smp_init_cpus (contains acpi_disabled)
On 27/06/16 17:29, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/22/2016 04:17 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
Hi Sudeep,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:48:38PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
This patch adds appropriate callbacks to support ACPI Low Power Idle
(LPI) on ARM64.
Now that arm_enter_idle_state is exactly
On 27/06/16 17:29, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/22/2016 04:17 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
Hi Sudeep,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:48:38PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
This patch adds appropriate callbacks to support ACPI Low Power Idle
(LPI) on ARM64.
Now that arm_enter_idle_state is exactly
On 06/22/2016 04:17 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
Hi Sudeep,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:48:38PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
This patch adds appropriate callbacks to support ACPI Low Power Idle
(LPI) on ARM64.
Now that arm_enter_idle_state is exactly same in both generic ARM{32,64}
CPUIdle
On 06/22/2016 04:17 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
Hi Sudeep,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:48:38PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
This patch adds appropriate callbacks to support ACPI Low Power Idle
(LPI) on ARM64.
Now that arm_enter_idle_state is exactly same in both generic ARM{32,64}
CPUIdle
Hi, Daniel,
On 24/06/16 22:04, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
[...]
+
+psci_states = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*psci_states), GFP_KERNEL);
+if (!psci_states)
+return -ENOMEM;
+
+for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+u32 state;
+
+lpi = >power.lpi_states[i + 1];
+state
Hi, Daniel,
On 24/06/16 22:04, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
[...]
+
+psci_states = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*psci_states), GFP_KERNEL);
+if (!psci_states)
+return -ENOMEM;
+
+for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+u32 state;
+
+lpi = >power.lpi_states[i + 1];
+state
On 06/25/2016 12:47 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[ ... ]
+ if (!acpi_disabled)
+ return psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle(cpu);
Is it possible the case where there is information in both the DT and in
ACPI ?
No, it isn't.
It is either-or, never both at the same time.
Ok,
On 06/25/2016 12:47 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[ ... ]
+ if (!acpi_disabled)
+ return psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle(cpu);
Is it possible the case where there is information in both the DT and in
ACPI ?
No, it isn't.
It is either-or, never both at the same time.
Ok,
On Friday, June 24, 2016 11:04:07 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 06/22/2016 04:17 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > Hi Sudeep,
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:48:38PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >> This patch adds appropriate callbacks to support ACPI Low Power Idle
> >> (LPI) on ARM64.
> >>
>
On Friday, June 24, 2016 11:04:07 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 06/22/2016 04:17 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > Hi Sudeep,
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:48:38PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >> This patch adds appropriate callbacks to support ACPI Low Power Idle
> >> (LPI) on ARM64.
> >>
>
On 06/22/2016 04:17 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
Hi Sudeep,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:48:38PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
This patch adds appropriate callbacks to support ACPI Low Power Idle
(LPI) on ARM64.
Now that arm_enter_idle_state is exactly same in both generic ARM{32,64}
CPUIdle
On 06/22/2016 04:17 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
Hi Sudeep,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:48:38PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
This patch adds appropriate callbacks to support ACPI Low Power Idle
(LPI) on ARM64.
Now that arm_enter_idle_state is exactly same in both generic ARM{32,64}
CPUIdle
Hi Sudeep,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:48:38PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> This patch adds appropriate callbacks to support ACPI Low Power Idle
> (LPI) on ARM64.
>
> Now that arm_enter_idle_state is exactly same in both generic ARM{32,64}
> CPUIdle driver and ARM64 backend for ACPI processor
Hi Sudeep,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:48:38PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> This patch adds appropriate callbacks to support ACPI Low Power Idle
> (LPI) on ARM64.
>
> Now that arm_enter_idle_state is exactly same in both generic ARM{32,64}
> CPUIdle driver and ARM64 backend for ACPI processor
This patch adds appropriate callbacks to support ACPI Low Power Idle
(LPI) on ARM64.
Now that arm_enter_idle_state is exactly same in both generic ARM{32,64}
CPUIdle driver and ARM64 backend for ACPI processor idle driver, we can
unify it and move to cpuidle-arm.h header.
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi
This patch adds appropriate callbacks to support ACPI Low Power Idle
(LPI) on ARM64.
Now that arm_enter_idle_state is exactly same in both generic ARM{32,64}
CPUIdle driver and ARM64 backend for ACPI processor idle driver, we can
unify it and move to cpuidle-arm.h header.
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi
18 matches
Mail list logo