On 10/11/2017 03:27 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 04:03:13PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
On 9/26/2017 3:52 PM, James Puthukattukaran wrote:
I think you want to do the part above as part of a quirk that runs before
the probe.
I don't think there's a way to run this early
On 10/11/2017 03:27 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 04:03:13PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
On 9/26/2017 3:52 PM, James Puthukattukaran wrote:
I think you want to do the part above as part of a quirk that runs before
the probe.
I don't think there's a way to run this early
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 04:03:13PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 9/26/2017 3:52 PM, James Puthukattukaran wrote:
> >> I think you want to do the part above as part of a quirk that runs before
> >> the probe.
> >
> > I don't think there's a way to run this early enough?
>
> Bjorn?
>
> I have
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 04:03:13PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 9/26/2017 3:52 PM, James Puthukattukaran wrote:
> >> I think you want to do the part above as part of a quirk that runs before
> >> the probe.
> >
> > I don't think there's a way to run this early enough?
>
> Bjorn?
>
> I have
This patch is word wrapped and doesn't apply.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 04:05:45PM -0400, James Puthukattukaran wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH v7] PCI: Workaround wrong flags completions for IDT switch
> From: James Puthukattukaran <james.puthukattuka...@oracle.com>
>
> The IDT switch
This patch is word wrapped and doesn't apply.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 04:05:45PM -0400, James Puthukattukaran wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH v7] PCI: Workaround wrong flags completions for IDT switch
> From: James Puthukattukaran
>
> The IDT switch incorrectly flags an ACS source violati
On 9/26/2017 3:52 PM, James Puthukattukaran wrote:
>> I think you want to do the part above as part of a quirk that runs before
>> the probe.
>
> I don't think there's a way to run this early enough?
Bjorn?
I have seen multiple quirk types in quirks.c some prefixed with EARLY and other
LATE.
On 9/26/2017 3:52 PM, James Puthukattukaran wrote:
>> I think you want to do the part above as part of a quirk that runs before
>> the probe.
>
> I don't think there's a way to run this early enough?
Bjorn?
I have seen multiple quirk types in quirks.c some prefixed with EARLY and other
LATE.
On 09/19/2017 07:36 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
On 9/18/2017 4:05 PM, James Puthukattukaran wrote:
Subject: [PATCH v7] PCI: Workaround wrong flags completions for IDT switch
From: James Puthukattukaran <james.puthukattuka...@oracle.com>
The IDT switch incorrectly flags an ACS source vio
On 09/19/2017 07:36 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
On 9/18/2017 4:05 PM, James Puthukattukaran wrote:
Subject: [PATCH v7] PCI: Workaround wrong flags completions for IDT switch
From: James Puthukattukaran
The IDT switch incorrectly flags an ACS source violation on a read config
request to an end point
On 9/18/2017 4:05 PM, James Puthukattukaran wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH v7] PCI: Workaround wrong flags completions for IDT switch
> From: James Puthukattukaran <james.puthukattuka...@oracle.com>
>
> The IDT switch incorrectly flags an ACS source violation on a read config
> re
On 9/18/2017 4:05 PM, James Puthukattukaran wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH v7] PCI: Workaround wrong flags completions for IDT switch
> From: James Puthukattukaran
>
> The IDT switch incorrectly flags an ACS source violation on a read config
> request to an end point device on the
Subject: [PATCH v7] PCI: Workaround wrong flags completions for IDT switch
From: James Puthukattukaran <james.puthukattuka...@oracle.com>
The IDT switch incorrectly flags an ACS source violation on a read config
request to an end point device on the completion (IDT 89H32H8G3-YC,
errata #36
Subject: [PATCH v7] PCI: Workaround wrong flags completions for IDT switch
From: James Puthukattukaran
The IDT switch incorrectly flags an ACS source violation on a read config
request to an end point device on the completion (IDT 89H32H8G3-YC,
errata #36) even though the PCI Express spec
14 matches
Mail list logo
