Ho Robin,
On 04/22/2016 04:49 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 22/04/16 13:00, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Hi Robin,
>> On 04/22/2016 01:31 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>> On 20/04/16 16:58, Eric Auger wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 04/20/2016 02:47 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 19/04/16
Ho Robin,
On 04/22/2016 04:49 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 22/04/16 13:00, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Hi Robin,
>> On 04/22/2016 01:31 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>> On 20/04/16 16:58, Eric Auger wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 04/20/2016 02:47 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 19/04/16
On 22/04/16 13:00, Eric Auger wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 04/22/2016 01:31 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 20/04/16 16:58, Eric Auger wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 04/20/2016 02:47 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
Hi Eric,
On 19/04/16 17:56, Eric Auger wrote:
Introduce a new DOMAIN_ATTR_MSI_MAPPING domain attribute. If
On 22/04/16 13:00, Eric Auger wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 04/22/2016 01:31 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 20/04/16 16:58, Eric Auger wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 04/20/2016 02:47 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
Hi Eric,
On 19/04/16 17:56, Eric Auger wrote:
Introduce a new DOMAIN_ATTR_MSI_MAPPING domain attribute. If
Hi Robin,
On 04/22/2016 01:31 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 20/04/16 16:58, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Hi Robin,
>> On 04/20/2016 02:47 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>> Hi Eric,
>>>
>>> On 19/04/16 17:56, Eric Auger wrote:
Introduce a new DOMAIN_ATTR_MSI_MAPPING domain attribute. If supported,
this
Hi Robin,
On 04/22/2016 01:31 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 20/04/16 16:58, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Hi Robin,
>> On 04/20/2016 02:47 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>> Hi Eric,
>>>
>>> On 19/04/16 17:56, Eric Auger wrote:
Introduce a new DOMAIN_ATTR_MSI_MAPPING domain attribute. If supported,
this
On 20/04/16 16:58, Eric Auger wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 04/20/2016 02:47 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
Hi Eric,
On 19/04/16 17:56, Eric Auger wrote:
Introduce a new DOMAIN_ATTR_MSI_MAPPING domain attribute. If supported,
this means the MSI addresses need to be mapped in the IOMMU.
x86 IOMMUs typically
On 20/04/16 16:58, Eric Auger wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 04/20/2016 02:47 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
Hi Eric,
On 19/04/16 17:56, Eric Auger wrote:
Introduce a new DOMAIN_ATTR_MSI_MAPPING domain attribute. If supported,
this means the MSI addresses need to be mapped in the IOMMU.
x86 IOMMUs typically
Hi Robin,
On 04/20/2016 02:47 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 19/04/16 17:56, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Introduce a new DOMAIN_ATTR_MSI_MAPPING domain attribute. If supported,
>> this means the MSI addresses need to be mapped in the IOMMU.
>>
>> x86 IOMMUs typically don't expose the
Hi Robin,
On 04/20/2016 02:47 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 19/04/16 17:56, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Introduce a new DOMAIN_ATTR_MSI_MAPPING domain attribute. If supported,
>> this means the MSI addresses need to be mapped in the IOMMU.
>>
>> x86 IOMMUs typically don't expose the
Hi Eric,
On 19/04/16 17:56, Eric Auger wrote:
Introduce a new DOMAIN_ATTR_MSI_MAPPING domain attribute. If supported,
this means the MSI addresses need to be mapped in the IOMMU.
x86 IOMMUs typically don't expose the attribute since on x86, MSI write
transaction addresses always are within the
Hi Eric,
On 19/04/16 17:56, Eric Auger wrote:
Introduce a new DOMAIN_ATTR_MSI_MAPPING domain attribute. If supported,
this means the MSI addresses need to be mapped in the IOMMU.
x86 IOMMUs typically don't expose the attribute since on x86, MSI write
transaction addresses always are within the
Introduce a new DOMAIN_ATTR_MSI_MAPPING domain attribute. If supported,
this means the MSI addresses need to be mapped in the IOMMU.
x86 IOMMUs typically don't expose the attribute since on x86, MSI write
transaction addresses always are within the 1MB PA region [FEE0_h -
FEF0_000h] window
Introduce a new DOMAIN_ATTR_MSI_MAPPING domain attribute. If supported,
this means the MSI addresses need to be mapped in the IOMMU.
x86 IOMMUs typically don't expose the attribute since on x86, MSI write
transaction addresses always are within the 1MB PA region [FEE0_h -
FEF0_000h] window
14 matches
Mail list logo