Re: [PATCH v7 05/49] audit: add a new "type" field to audit_names struct

2012-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 11:50:28 -0400 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > +#defineAUDIT_TYPE_UNKNOWN 0 /* we don't know yet */ > > +#define AUDIT_TYPE_NORMAL 1 /* a "normal" audit record */ > > I don't care about tab vs space after the #define, but at least be > consistent. > I

Re: [PATCH v7 05/49] audit: add a new "type" field to audit_names struct

2012-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 11:50:28 -0400 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > +#defineAUDIT_TYPE_UNKNOWN 0 /* we don't know yet */ > > +#define AUDIT_TYPE_NORMAL 1 /* a "normal" audit record */ > > I don't care about tab vs space after the #define, but at least be > consistent. > My

Re: [PATCH v7 05/49] audit: add a new "type" field to audit_names struct

2012-10-02 Thread Christoph Hellwig
> +#define AUDIT_TYPE_UNKNOWN 0 /* we don't know yet */ > +#define AUDIT_TYPE_NORMAL1 /* a "normal" audit record */ I don't care about tab vs space after the #define, but at least be consistent. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"

Re: [PATCH v7 05/49] audit: add a new type field to audit_names struct

2012-10-02 Thread Christoph Hellwig
+#define AUDIT_TYPE_UNKNOWN 0 /* we don't know yet */ +#define AUDIT_TYPE_NORMAL1 /* a normal audit record */ I don't care about tab vs space after the #define, but at least be consistent. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the

Re: [PATCH v7 05/49] audit: add a new type field to audit_names struct

2012-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 11:50:28 -0400 Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org wrote: +#defineAUDIT_TYPE_UNKNOWN 0 /* we don't know yet */ +#define AUDIT_TYPE_NORMAL 1 /* a normal audit record */ I don't care about tab vs space after the #define, but at least be consistent.

Re: [PATCH v7 05/49] audit: add a new type field to audit_names struct

2012-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 11:50:28 -0400 Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org wrote: +#defineAUDIT_TYPE_UNKNOWN 0 /* we don't know yet */ +#define AUDIT_TYPE_NORMAL 1 /* a normal audit record */ I don't care about tab vs space after the #define, but at least be consistent.

[PATCH v7 05/49] audit: add a new "type" field to audit_names struct

2012-10-01 Thread Jeff Layton
For now, we just have two possibilities: UNKNOWN: for a new audit_names record that we don't know anything about yet NORMAL: for everything else In later patches, we'll add other types so we can distinguish and update records created under different circumstances. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton

[PATCH v7 05/49] audit: add a new type field to audit_names struct

2012-10-01 Thread Jeff Layton
For now, we just have two possibilities: UNKNOWN: for a new audit_names record that we don't know anything about yet NORMAL: for everything else In later patches, we'll add other types so we can distinguish and update records created under different circumstances. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton