On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 09:32:19 +0100
Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Hi Jonathan
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 06:34:04PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 13:51:13 +0100
> > Cristian Marussi wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jonathan,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:33:25PM +0100, Jona
Hi Jonathan
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 06:34:04PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 13:51:13 +0100
> Cristian Marussi wrote:
>
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:33:25PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 12:48:50 +
> > > Cristian Marus
On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 13:51:13 +0100
Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:33:25PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 12:48:50 +
> > Cristian Marussi wrote:
> >
> > > Port driver to the new SCMI Sensor interface based on protocol handles
Hi Jonathan,
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:33:25PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 12:48:50 +
> Cristian Marussi wrote:
>
> > Port driver to the new SCMI Sensor interface based on protocol handles
> > and common devm_get_ops().
> >
> > Cc: Jyoti Bhayana
> > Cc: Jonathan C
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 12:48:50 +
Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Port driver to the new SCMI Sensor interface based on protocol handles
> and common devm_get_ops().
>
> Cc: Jyoti Bhayana
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi
+CC linux-...@vger.kernel.org
Rule of thumb if it d
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 09:48:28 +
Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 12:12:02PM +, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:38:43PM -0700, Jyoti Bhayana wrote:
> > > Hi Christian,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the detailed explanation. Sounds good to me.
>
Hi Jonathan,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 12:12:02PM +, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:38:43PM -0700, Jyoti Bhayana wrote:
> > Hi Christian,
> >
> > Thanks for the detailed explanation. Sounds good to me.
> >
>
> Can I get official Reviewed-by or Acked-by please if you are fine
iio/scmi: port driver to the new scmi_sensor_proto_ops interface
Port driver to the new SCMI Sensor interface based on protocol handles
and common devm_get_ops().
Cc: Jyoti Bhayana
Cc: Jonathan Cameron
Acked-by: Jyoti Bhayana
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi
On Thu,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:38:43PM -0700, Jyoti Bhayana wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Thanks for the detailed explanation. Sounds good to me.
>
Can I get official Reviewed-by or Acked-by please if you are fine with the
change ?
I definitely need one from Jonathan to merge this and one from Jyoti i
Hi Christian,
Thanks for the detailed explanation. Sounds good to me.
Thanks,
Jyoti
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 3:22 PM Cristian Marussi
wrote:
>
> Hi Jyoti,
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:51:48AM -0700, Jyoti Bhayana wrote:
> > Hi Christian,
> >
> > Thanks for porting this driver to the new interf
Hi Jyoti,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:51:48AM -0700, Jyoti Bhayana wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Thanks for porting this driver to the new interface. I have two questions:
>
> 1) In the following code snippet, can the sensor_ops be made as part
> of struct scmi_iio_priv as scmi_protocol_handle is a
Hi Christian,
Thanks for porting this driver to the new interface. I have two questions:
1) In the following code snippet, can the sensor_ops be made as part
of struct scmi_iio_priv as scmi_protocol_handle is also part of that
struct. Not sure if there are any particular reasons for having the
p
Port driver to the new SCMI Sensor interface based on protocol handles
and common devm_get_ops().
Cc: Jyoti Bhayana
Cc: Jonathan Cameron
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi
---
drivers/iio/common/scmi_sensors/scmi_iio.c | 91 ++
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
13 matches
Mail list logo