On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 7:23 PM Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>
> > Ok, Great. Do we need to write to him about this patchset?
>
> Nope. Hint: You can dig in the mail archives studying older patches to
> see how things work. I do this as well because things may work
> differently per subsystem.
>
Thanks
> Ok, Great. Do we need to write to him about this patchset?
Nope. Hint: You can dig in the mail archives studying older patches to
see how things work. I do this as well because things may work
differently per subsystem.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 6:04 PM Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
> > Thank you Andrew for reviewing the patch set.
> > Can you please let me know weather you or Peter will be pick up the patch
> > for v5.3 or they should go in via some other tree?
>
> Hi Sagar
>
> Wolfram Sang should pick the
> Thank you Andrew for reviewing the patch set.
> Can you please let me know weather you or Peter will be pick up the patch
> for v5.3 or they should go in via some other tree?
Hi Sagar
Wolfram Sang should pick the patchset up.
Andrew
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 02:29:34PM +0530, Sagar Shrikant Kadam wrote:
> The i2c-ocore driver already has a polling mode interface.But it needs
> a workaround for FU540 Chipset on HiFive unleashed board (RevA00).
> There is an erratum in FU540 chip that prevents interrupt driven i2c
> transfers
The i2c-ocore driver already has a polling mode interface.But it needs
a workaround for FU540 Chipset on HiFive unleashed board (RevA00).
There is an erratum in FU540 chip that prevents interrupt driven i2c
transfers from working, and also the I2C controller's interrupt bit
cannot be cleared if
6 matches
Mail list logo
