On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:10:35PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Greg,
>
> Even though using copyleft-next was fine by Linus [0], AKASHI had brought that
> he expected to see an "or" clause on the license declarations when using
> copyleft-next. This was the only pending issue from the last
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:10:35PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Greg,
>
> Even though using copyleft-next was fine by Linus [0], AKASHI had brought that
> he expected to see an "or" clause on the license declarations when using
> copyleft-next. This was the only pending issue from the last
Greg,
Even though using copyleft-next was fine by Linus [0], AKASHI had brought that
he expected to see an "or" clause on the license declarations when using
copyleft-next. This was the only pending issue from the last v7 series [1]. To
be safe I re-touched the subject and Alan and Ted brought up
Greg,
Even though using copyleft-next was fine by Linus [0], AKASHI had brought that
he expected to see an "or" clause on the license declarations when using
copyleft-next. This was the only pending issue from the last v7 series [1]. To
be safe I re-touched the subject and Alan and Ted brought up
4 matches
Mail list logo