Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] tracing/hyper-v: trace hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others()

Steven Rostedt writes: > On Fri, 09 Jun 2017 20:53:53 +0200 > Paul Bolle wrote: > >> On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 14:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: >> > I'm sure it works, but it just adds one more way of doing the same >> > thing. I thought that was what perl

Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] tracing/hyper-v: trace hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others()

Steven Rostedt writes: > On Fri, 09 Jun 2017 20:53:53 +0200 > Paul Bolle wrote: > >> On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 14:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: >> > I'm sure it works, but it just adds one more way of doing the same >> > thing. I thought that was what perl was always criticized for, and why >> >

Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] tracing/hyper-v: trace hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others()

On Fri, 09 Jun 2017 20:53:53 +0200 Paul Bolle wrote: > On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 14:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > I'm sure it works, but it just adds one more way of doing the same > > thing. I thought that was what perl was always criticized for, and why > > people usually

Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] tracing/hyper-v: trace hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others()

On Fri, 09 Jun 2017 20:53:53 +0200 Paul Bolle wrote: > On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 14:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > I'm sure it works, but it just adds one more way of doing the same > > thing. I thought that was what perl was always criticized for, and why > > people usually prefer python.

Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] tracing/hyper-v: trace hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others()

On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 14:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > I'm sure it works, but it just adds one more way of doing the same > thing. I thought that was what perl was always criticized for, and why > people usually prefer python. Don't get me wrong, I prefer oysters over > snakes. But I just

Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] tracing/hyper-v: trace hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others()

On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 14:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > I'm sure it works, but it just adds one more way of doing the same > thing. I thought that was what perl was always criticized for, and why > people usually prefer python. Don't get me wrong, I prefer oysters over > snakes. But I just

Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] tracing/hyper-v: trace hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others()

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:32 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 21:23:52 +0300 > Andy Shevchenko wrote: > I'm sure it works, but it just adds one more way of doing the same > thing. I thought that was what perl was always criticized

Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] tracing/hyper-v: trace hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others()

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:32 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 21:23:52 +0300 > Andy Shevchenko wrote: > I'm sure it works, but it just adds one more way of doing the same > thing. I thought that was what perl was always criticized for, and why > people usually prefer python. Don't

Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] tracing/hyper-v: trace hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others()

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 21:23:52 +0300 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:04 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 15:27:36 +0200 > > Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > > >> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)

Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] tracing/hyper-v: trace hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others()

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 21:23:52 +0300 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:04 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 15:27:36 +0200 > > Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > > >> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV) > > > > Hmm, this is new to me. I know you can use IS_ENABLED()

Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] tracing/hyper-v: trace hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others()

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:04 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 15:27:36 +0200 > Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV) > > Hmm, this is new to me. I know you can use IS_ENABLED() inside C code, > but I've never seen it

Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] tracing/hyper-v: trace hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others()

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:04 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 15:27:36 +0200 > Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV) > > Hmm, this is new to me. I know you can use IS_ENABLED() inside C code, > but I've never seen it used for preprocessor directives. This

Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] tracing/hyper-v: trace hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others()

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 15:27:36 +0200 Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Add Hyper-V tracing subsystem and trace hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others(). > Tracing is done the same way we do xen_mmu_flush_tlb_others(). > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov > --- >

Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] tracing/hyper-v: trace hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others()

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 15:27:36 +0200 Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Add Hyper-V tracing subsystem and trace hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others(). > Tracing is done the same way we do xen_mmu_flush_tlb_others(). > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov > --- > MAINTAINERS | 1 + >

[PATCH v8 10/10] tracing/hyper-v: trace hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others()

Add Hyper-V tracing subsystem and trace hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others(). Tracing is done the same way we do xen_mmu_flush_tlb_others(). Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov --- MAINTAINERS | 1 + arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c | 7 +++

[PATCH v8 10/10] tracing/hyper-v: trace hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others()

Add Hyper-V tracing subsystem and trace hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others(). Tracing is done the same way we do xen_mmu_flush_tlb_others(). Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov --- MAINTAINERS | 1 + arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c | 7 +++