On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 09:31:05AM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:55:30 -0700
> Alex Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 18:05 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > I had to add an explicit tag to suppress compiler warning:
> > > gcc isn't smart enough to notice that
On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:55:30 -0700
Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 18:05 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > I had to add an explicit tag to suppress compiler warning:
> > gcc isn't smart enough to notice that
> > len is always initialized since function is called with size > 0.
>
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 18:05 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I had to add an explicit tag to suppress compiler warning:
> gcc isn't smart enough to notice that
> len is always initialized since function is called with size > 0.
I'm getting a panic inside a guest when this change is applied on th
I had to add an explicit tag to suppress compiler warning:
gcc isn't smart enough to notice that
len is always initialized since function is called with size > 0.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck
---
drivers/vhost/net.c | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insert
4 matches
Mail list logo