v9:
* Fixed naming for __compat_only_sysfs_link_entry_to_kobj()
v8:
* Renamed sysfs_link_entry_to_kobj() to
__compat_only_sysfs_link_entry_to_kobj()
v7:
* Fixed compile error when CONFIG_SYSFS is not enabled.
v6:
* Updated documentation.
v5:
* Removed dangling export of
v9:
* Fixed naming for __compat_only_sysfs_link_entry_to_kobj()
v8:
* Renamed sysfs_link_entry_to_kobj() to
__compat_only_sysfs_link_entry_to_kobj()
v7:
* Fixed compile error when CONFIG_SYSFS is not enabled.
v6:
* Updated documentation.
v5:
* Removed dangling export of
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 07:20:24PM +0200, Peter Huewe wrote:
> Will look at it as soon as possible - relocating to the us is quite
> stressful.sorry about that.
>
> But since we are already at v9 i think it is in a good shape.
> Peter
Alright, thanks for informing about this!
/Jarkko
> Am
Will look at it as soon as possible - relocating to the us is quite
stressful.sorry about that.
But since we are already at v9 i think it is in a good shape.
Peter
Am 25. August 2015 19:03:27 MESZ, schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen
:
>Does this start be in the shape that there would be chance to pull
Does this start be in the shape that there would be chance to pull this
in at some point? To be able to enable TPM 2.0 chips from Linux is quite
mandatory feature in my opinion.
Thank you.
/Jarkko
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 05:05:40PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> v9:
> * Fixed naming for
Will look at it as soon as possible - relocating to the us is quite
stressful.sorry about that.
But since we are already at v9 i think it is in a good shape.
Peter
Am 25. August 2015 19:03:27 MESZ, schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen
jarkko.sakki...@intel.com:
Does this start be in the shape that there
Does this start be in the shape that there would be chance to pull this
in at some point? To be able to enable TPM 2.0 chips from Linux is quite
mandatory feature in my opinion.
Thank you.
/Jarkko
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 05:05:40PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
v9:
* Fixed naming for
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 07:20:24PM +0200, Peter Huewe wrote:
Will look at it as soon as possible - relocating to the us is quite
stressful.sorry about that.
But since we are already at v9 i think it is in a good shape.
Peter
Alright, thanks for informing about this!
/Jarkko
Am 25.
v9:
* Fixed naming for __compat_only_sysfs_link_entry_to_kobj()
v8:
* Renamed sysfs_link_entry_to_kobj() to
__compat_only_sysfs_link_entry_to_kobj()
v7:
* Fixed compile error when CONFIG_SYSFS is not enabled.
v6:
* Updated documentation.
v5:
* Removed dangling export of
v9:
* Fixed naming for __compat_only_sysfs_link_entry_to_kobj()
v8:
* Renamed sysfs_link_entry_to_kobj() to
__compat_only_sysfs_link_entry_to_kobj()
v7:
* Fixed compile error when CONFIG_SYSFS is not enabled.
v6:
* Updated documentation.
v5:
* Removed dangling export of
10 matches
Mail list logo
