[PATCH v9 07/11] sched: move no_new_privs into new atomic flags

2014-06-27 Thread Kees Cook
Since seccomp transitions between threads requires updates to the
no_new_privs flag to be atomic, the flag must be part of an atomic flag
set. This moves the nnp flag into a separate task field, and introduces
accessors.

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook 
---
 fs/exec.c  |4 ++--
 include/linux/sched.h  |   18 +++---
 kernel/seccomp.c   |2 +-
 kernel/sys.c   |4 ++--
 security/apparmor/domain.c |4 ++--
 5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index a3d33fe592d6..0f5c272410f6 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1234,7 +1234,7 @@ static void check_unsafe_exec(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 * This isn't strictly necessary, but it makes it harder for LSMs to
 * mess up.
 */
-   if (current->no_new_privs)
+   if (task_no_new_privs(current))
bprm->unsafe |= LSM_UNSAFE_NO_NEW_PRIVS;
 
t = p;
@@ -1272,7 +1272,7 @@ int prepare_binprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
bprm->cred->egid = current_egid();
 
if (!(bprm->file->f_path.mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_NOSUID) &&
-   !current->no_new_privs &&
+   !task_no_new_privs(current) &&
kuid_has_mapping(bprm->cred->user_ns, inode->i_uid) &&
kgid_has_mapping(bprm->cred->user_ns, inode->i_gid)) {
/* Set-uid? */
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 306f4f0c987a..0fd19055bb64 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1307,13 +1307,12 @@ struct task_struct {
 * execve */
unsigned in_iowait:1;
 
-   /* task may not gain privileges */
-   unsigned no_new_privs:1;
-
/* Revert to default priority/policy when forking */
unsigned sched_reset_on_fork:1;
unsigned sched_contributes_to_load:1;
 
+   unsigned long atomic_flags; /* Flags needing atomic access. */
+
pid_t pid;
pid_t tgid;
 
@@ -1967,6 +1966,19 @@ static inline void memalloc_noio_restore(unsigned int 
flags)
current->flags = (current->flags & ~PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO) | flags;
 }
 
+/* Per-process atomic flags. */
+#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0x0001/* May not gain new privileges. */
+
+static inline bool task_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+   return test_bit(PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS, >atomic_flags);
+}
+
+static inline void task_set_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+   set_bit(PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS, >atomic_flags);
+}
+
 /*
  * task->jobctl flags
  */
diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index 2f83496d6016..137e40c7ae3b 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static long seccomp_attach_filter(struct sock_fprog *fprog)
 * This avoids scenarios where unprivileged tasks can affect the
 * behavior of privileged children.
 */
-   if (!current->no_new_privs &&
+   if (!task_no_new_privs(current) &&
security_capable_noaudit(current_cred(), current_user_ns(),
 CAP_SYS_ADMIN) != 0)
return -EACCES;
diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
index 66a751ebf9d9..ce8129192a26 100644
--- a/kernel/sys.c
+++ b/kernel/sys.c
@@ -1990,12 +1990,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(prctl, int, option, unsigned long, 
arg2, unsigned long, arg3,
if (arg2 != 1 || arg3 || arg4 || arg5)
return -EINVAL;
 
-   current->no_new_privs = 1;
+   task_set_no_new_privs(current);
break;
case PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS:
if (arg2 || arg3 || arg4 || arg5)
return -EINVAL;
-   return current->no_new_privs ? 1 : 0;
+   return task_no_new_privs(current) ? 1 : 0;
case PR_GET_THP_DISABLE:
if (arg2 || arg3 || arg4 || arg5)
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/security/apparmor/domain.c b/security/apparmor/domain.c
index 452567d3a08e..d97cba3e3849 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/domain.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/domain.c
@@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ int aa_change_hat(const char *hats[], int count, u64 token, 
bool permtest)
 * There is no exception for unconfined as change_hat is not
 * available.
 */
-   if (current->no_new_privs)
+   if (task_no_new_privs(current))
return -EPERM;
 
/* released below */
@@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ int aa_change_profile(const char *ns_name, const char 
*hname, bool onexec,
 * no_new_privs is set because this aways results in a reduction
 * of permissions.
 */
-   if (current->no_new_privs && !unconfined(profile)) {
+   if (task_no_new_privs(current) && !unconfined(profile)) {
put_cred(cred);
return -EPERM;
}
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org

[PATCH v9 07/11] sched: move no_new_privs into new atomic flags

2014-06-27 Thread Kees Cook
Since seccomp transitions between threads requires updates to the
no_new_privs flag to be atomic, the flag must be part of an atomic flag
set. This moves the nnp flag into a separate task field, and introduces
accessors.

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook keesc...@chromium.org
---
 fs/exec.c  |4 ++--
 include/linux/sched.h  |   18 +++---
 kernel/seccomp.c   |2 +-
 kernel/sys.c   |4 ++--
 security/apparmor/domain.c |4 ++--
 5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index a3d33fe592d6..0f5c272410f6 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1234,7 +1234,7 @@ static void check_unsafe_exec(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 * This isn't strictly necessary, but it makes it harder for LSMs to
 * mess up.
 */
-   if (current-no_new_privs)
+   if (task_no_new_privs(current))
bprm-unsafe |= LSM_UNSAFE_NO_NEW_PRIVS;
 
t = p;
@@ -1272,7 +1272,7 @@ int prepare_binprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
bprm-cred-egid = current_egid();
 
if (!(bprm-file-f_path.mnt-mnt_flags  MNT_NOSUID) 
-   !current-no_new_privs 
+   !task_no_new_privs(current) 
kuid_has_mapping(bprm-cred-user_ns, inode-i_uid) 
kgid_has_mapping(bprm-cred-user_ns, inode-i_gid)) {
/* Set-uid? */
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 306f4f0c987a..0fd19055bb64 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1307,13 +1307,12 @@ struct task_struct {
 * execve */
unsigned in_iowait:1;
 
-   /* task may not gain privileges */
-   unsigned no_new_privs:1;
-
/* Revert to default priority/policy when forking */
unsigned sched_reset_on_fork:1;
unsigned sched_contributes_to_load:1;
 
+   unsigned long atomic_flags; /* Flags needing atomic access. */
+
pid_t pid;
pid_t tgid;
 
@@ -1967,6 +1966,19 @@ static inline void memalloc_noio_restore(unsigned int 
flags)
current-flags = (current-flags  ~PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO) | flags;
 }
 
+/* Per-process atomic flags. */
+#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0x0001/* May not gain new privileges. */
+
+static inline bool task_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+   return test_bit(PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS, p-atomic_flags);
+}
+
+static inline void task_set_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+   set_bit(PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS, p-atomic_flags);
+}
+
 /*
  * task-jobctl flags
  */
diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index 2f83496d6016..137e40c7ae3b 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static long seccomp_attach_filter(struct sock_fprog *fprog)
 * This avoids scenarios where unprivileged tasks can affect the
 * behavior of privileged children.
 */
-   if (!current-no_new_privs 
+   if (!task_no_new_privs(current) 
security_capable_noaudit(current_cred(), current_user_ns(),
 CAP_SYS_ADMIN) != 0)
return -EACCES;
diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
index 66a751ebf9d9..ce8129192a26 100644
--- a/kernel/sys.c
+++ b/kernel/sys.c
@@ -1990,12 +1990,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(prctl, int, option, unsigned long, 
arg2, unsigned long, arg3,
if (arg2 != 1 || arg3 || arg4 || arg5)
return -EINVAL;
 
-   current-no_new_privs = 1;
+   task_set_no_new_privs(current);
break;
case PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS:
if (arg2 || arg3 || arg4 || arg5)
return -EINVAL;
-   return current-no_new_privs ? 1 : 0;
+   return task_no_new_privs(current) ? 1 : 0;
case PR_GET_THP_DISABLE:
if (arg2 || arg3 || arg4 || arg5)
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/security/apparmor/domain.c b/security/apparmor/domain.c
index 452567d3a08e..d97cba3e3849 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/domain.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/domain.c
@@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ int aa_change_hat(const char *hats[], int count, u64 token, 
bool permtest)
 * There is no exception for unconfined as change_hat is not
 * available.
 */
-   if (current-no_new_privs)
+   if (task_no_new_privs(current))
return -EPERM;
 
/* released below */
@@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ int aa_change_profile(const char *ns_name, const char 
*hname, bool onexec,
 * no_new_privs is set because this aways results in a reduction
 * of permissions.
 */
-   if (current-no_new_privs  !unconfined(profile)) {
+   if (task_no_new_privs(current)  !unconfined(profile)) {
put_cred(cred);
return -EPERM;
}
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info