Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:55:53PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Andy Gross wrote: > > The arm-soc guys merged the Qualcomm pull requests. So you can just use my > > qcom-drivers-for-4.19 tag. That won't change at this point. > >

Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:55:53PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Andy Gross wrote: > > The arm-soc guys merged the Qualcomm pull requests. So you can just use my > > qcom-drivers-for-4.19 tag. That won't change at this point. > >

Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

Mark, On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Andy Gross wrote: > + olof > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 05:59:42PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 08:43:46AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: >> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Mark Brown wrote: >> >> > > There was also some other thing

Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

Mark, On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Andy Gross wrote: > + olof > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 05:59:42PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 08:43:46AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: >> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Mark Brown wrote: >> >> > > There was also some other thing

Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

+ olof On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 05:59:42PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 08:43:46AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > There was also some other thing called command DB as well which was a > > > separate series.

Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

+ olof On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 05:59:42PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 08:43:46AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > There was also some other thing called command DB as well which was a > > > separate series.

Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 08:43:46AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > There was also some other thing called command DB as well which was a > > separate series. Ideally there'd be a branch I could pull as there's a > > build dependency on rpmh

Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 08:43:46AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > There was also some other thing called command DB as well which was a > > separate series. Ideally there'd be a branch I could pull as there's a > > build dependency on rpmh

Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

Hi, On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 08:11:30AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > >> RPMh itself landed in Andy's tree and he sent a pull request on >> Saturday. Feel free to refer to the request ("[GIT PULL] Qualcomm >> Driver updates for 4.19") AKA >>

Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

Hi, On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 08:11:30AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > >> RPMh itself landed in Andy's tree and he sent a pull request on >> Saturday. Feel free to refer to the request ("[GIT PULL] Qualcomm >> Driver updates for 4.19") AKA >>

Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 08:11:30AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > RPMh itself landed in Andy's tree and he sent a pull request on > Saturday. Feel free to refer to the request ("[GIT PULL] Qualcomm > Driver updates for 4.19") AKA > . > It doesn't

Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 08:11:30AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > RPMh itself landed in Andy's tree and he sent a pull request on > Saturday. Feel free to refer to the request ("[GIT PULL] Qualcomm > Driver updates for 4.19") AKA > . > It doesn't

Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

Hi, On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 7:57 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 01:09:05PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > >> I know you are still looking for time to review the RPMh-regulator >> driver and that's fine. One idea I had though: if the bindings look >> OK to you and are less

Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

Hi, On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 7:57 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 01:09:05PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > >> I know you are still looking for time to review the RPMh-regulator >> driver and that's fine. One idea I had though: if the bindings look >> OK to you and are less

Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 01:09:05PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > I know you are still looking for time to review the RPMh-regulator > driver and that's fine. One idea I had though: if the bindings look > OK to you and are less controversial, is there any chance they could > land in the meantime?

Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 01:09:05PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > I know you are still looking for time to review the RPMh-regulator > driver and that's fine. One idea I had though: if the bindings look > OK to you and are less controversial, is there any chance they could > land in the meantime?

Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

Hi Mark, On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 6:50 PM, David Collins wrote: > Introduce bindings for RPMh regulator devices found on some > Qualcomm Technlogies, Inc. SoCs. These devices allow a given > processor within the SoC to make PMIC regulator requests which > are aggregated within the RPMh hardware

Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

Hi Mark, On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 6:50 PM, David Collins wrote: > Introduce bindings for RPMh regulator devices found on some > Qualcomm Technlogies, Inc. SoCs. These devices allow a given > processor within the SoC to make PMIC regulator requests which > are aggregated within the RPMh hardware

[PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

Introduce bindings for RPMh regulator devices found on some Qualcomm Technlogies, Inc. SoCs. These devices allow a given processor within the SoC to make PMIC regulator requests which are aggregated within the RPMh hardware block along with requests from other processors in the SoC to determine

[PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

Introduce bindings for RPMh regulator devices found on some Qualcomm Technlogies, Inc. SoCs. These devices allow a given processor within the SoC to make PMIC regulator requests which are aggregated within the RPMh hardware block along with requests from other processors in the SoC to determine