On 10/28/2014 04:38 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Ren, Qiaowei wrote:
On 2014-10-24, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
+int mpx_enable_management(struct task_struct *tsk) {
+ struct mm_struct *mm = tsk->mm;
+ void __user *bd_base =
On 10/28/2014 04:38 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Ren, Qiaowei wrote:
On 2014-10-24, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
+int mpx_enable_management(struct task_struct *tsk) {
+ struct mm_struct *mm = tsk-mm;
+ void __user *bd_base =
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Ren, Qiaowei wrote:
> On 2014-10-24, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Oct 2014, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
> >> +int mpx_enable_management(struct task_struct *tsk) {
> >> + struct mm_struct *mm = tsk->mm;
> >> + void __user *bd_base = MPX_INVALID_BOUNDS_DIR;
> >
> > What's the
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Ren, Qiaowei wrote:
On 2014-10-24, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
+int mpx_enable_management(struct task_struct *tsk) {
+ struct mm_struct *mm = tsk-mm;
+ void __user *bd_base = MPX_INVALID_BOUNDS_DIR;
What's the point of
On 2014-10-24, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2014, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
>> +int mpx_enable_management(struct task_struct *tsk) {
>> +struct mm_struct *mm = tsk->mm;
>> +void __user *bd_base = MPX_INVALID_BOUNDS_DIR;
>
> What's the point of initializing bd_base here. I had to
On 2014-10-24, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
+int mpx_enable_management(struct task_struct *tsk) {
+struct mm_struct *mm = tsk-mm;
+void __user *bd_base = MPX_INVALID_BOUNDS_DIR;
What's the point of initializing bd_base here. I had to look twice to
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2014, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
> > +int mpx_enable_management(struct task_struct *tsk)
> > +{
> > + struct mm_struct *mm = tsk->mm;
> > + void __user *bd_base = MPX_INVALID_BOUNDS_DIR;
>
> What's the point of initializing bd_base here. I
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
> +int mpx_enable_management(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> + struct mm_struct *mm = tsk->mm;
> + void __user *bd_base = MPX_INVALID_BOUNDS_DIR;
What's the point of initializing bd_base here. I had to look twice to
figure out that it gets
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
+int mpx_enable_management(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ struct mm_struct *mm = tsk-mm;
+ void __user *bd_base = MPX_INVALID_BOUNDS_DIR;
What's the point of initializing bd_base here. I had to look twice to
figure out that it gets overwritten by
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
+int mpx_enable_management(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ struct mm_struct *mm = tsk-mm;
+ void __user *bd_base = MPX_INVALID_BOUNDS_DIR;
What's the point of initializing bd_base here. I had to look
This patch adds two prctl() commands to provide one explicit interaction
mechanism to enable or disable the management of bounds tables in kernel,
including on-demand kernel allocation (See the patch "on-demand kernel
allocation of bounds tables") and cleanup (See the patch "cleanup unused
bound
This patch adds two prctl() commands to provide one explicit interaction
mechanism to enable or disable the management of bounds tables in kernel,
including on-demand kernel allocation (See the patch on-demand kernel
allocation of bounds tables) and cleanup (See the patch cleanup unused
bound
12 matches
Mail list logo