On 08/27/2018 09:51 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:47:58 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/27/2018 04:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 10:16:59 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/23/2018 06:25 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400
Tony
On 08/27/2018 09:51 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:47:58 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/27/2018 04:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 10:16:59 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/23/2018 06:25 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400
Tony
On 08/27/2018 03:51 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:47:58 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/27/2018 04:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 10:16:59 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/23/2018 06:25 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400
On 08/27/2018 03:51 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:47:58 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/27/2018 04:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 10:16:59 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/23/2018 06:25 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:47:58 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
> On 08/27/2018 04:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 10:16:59 -0400
> > Tony Krowiak wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/23/2018 06:25 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400
> >>> Tony Krowiak wrote:
>
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:47:58 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
> On 08/27/2018 04:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 10:16:59 -0400
> > Tony Krowiak wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/23/2018 06:25 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400
> >>> Tony Krowiak wrote:
>
On 08/27/2018 04:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 10:16:59 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/23/2018 06:25 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
One of the things I suggested in a private conversation with Christian
earlier
today
On 08/27/2018 04:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 10:16:59 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/23/2018 06:25 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
One of the things I suggested in a private conversation with Christian
earlier
today
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 10:16:59 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
> On 08/23/2018 06:25 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400
> > Tony Krowiak wrote:
> >
> >> One of the things I suggested in a private conversation with Christian
> >> earlier
> >> today was to provide an
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 10:16:59 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
> On 08/23/2018 06:25 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400
> > Tony Krowiak wrote:
> >
> >> One of the things I suggested in a private conversation with Christian
> >> earlier
> >> today was to provide an
On 08/23/2018 06:25 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
One of the things I suggested in a private conversation with Christian
earlier
today was to provide an additional rw sysfs attribute - a boolean - that
indicates
whether all usage domains
On 08/23/2018 06:25 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
One of the things I suggested in a private conversation with Christian
earlier
today was to provide an additional rw sysfs attribute - a boolean - that
indicates
whether all usage domains
On 23/08/2018 13:31, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 12:43:42 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
On 23/08/2018 12:25, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
One of the things I suggested in a private conversation with Christian
earlier
today was to
On 23/08/2018 13:31, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 12:43:42 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
On 23/08/2018 12:25, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
One of the things I suggested in a private conversation with Christian
earlier
today was to
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 12:43:42 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 23/08/2018 12:25, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400
> > Tony Krowiak wrote:
> >
> >> One of the things I suggested in a private conversation with Christian
> >> earlier
> >> today was to provide an
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 12:43:42 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 23/08/2018 12:25, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400
> > Tony Krowiak wrote:
> >
> >> One of the things I suggested in a private conversation with Christian
> >> earlier
> >> today was to provide an
On 23/08/2018 12:25, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
One of the things I suggested in a private conversation with Christian
earlier
today was to provide an additional rw sysfs attribute - a boolean - that
indicates
whether all usage domains should
On 23/08/2018 12:25, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
One of the things I suggested in a private conversation with Christian
earlier
today was to provide an additional rw sysfs attribute - a boolean - that
indicates
whether all usage domains should
On 23/08/2018 11:26, Halil Pasic wrote:
On 08/22/2018 09:16 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/22/2018 01:11 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On 08/22/2018 05:48 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 08/22/2018 05:34 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 22/08/2018 17:11, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On
On 23/08/2018 11:26, Halil Pasic wrote:
On 08/22/2018 09:16 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/22/2018 01:11 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On 08/22/2018 05:48 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 08/22/2018 05:34 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 22/08/2018 17:11, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
> One of the things I suggested in a private conversation with Christian
> earlier
> today was to provide an additional rw sysfs attribute - a boolean - that
> indicates
> whether all usage domains should also be control domains. The
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
> One of the things I suggested in a private conversation with Christian
> earlier
> today was to provide an additional rw sysfs attribute - a boolean - that
> indicates
> whether all usage domains should also be control domains. The
On 08/22/2018 09:16 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/22/2018 01:11 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On 08/22/2018 05:48 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 08/22/2018 05:34 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 22/08/2018 17:11, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 08/22/2018 01:03 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
That's
On 08/22/2018 09:16 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/22/2018 01:11 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On 08/22/2018 05:48 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 08/22/2018 05:34 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 22/08/2018 17:11, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 08/22/2018 01:03 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
That's
On 08/22/2018 01:11 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On 08/22/2018 05:48 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 08/22/2018 05:34 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 22/08/2018 17:11, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 08/22/2018 01:03 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
That's interesting.
IMHO this quote is quite a
On 08/22/2018 01:11 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On 08/22/2018 05:48 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 08/22/2018 05:34 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 22/08/2018 17:11, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 08/22/2018 01:03 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
That's interesting.
IMHO this quote is quite a
On 08/22/2018 05:48 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 08/22/2018 05:34 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 22/08/2018 17:11, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 08/22/2018 01:03 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
That's interesting.
IMHO this quote is quite a half-full half-empty cup one:
* it mandates the
On 08/22/2018 05:48 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 08/22/2018 05:34 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 22/08/2018 17:11, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 08/22/2018 01:03 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
That's interesting.
IMHO this quote is quite a half-full half-empty cup one:
* it mandates the
On 22/08/2018 17:48, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 08/22/2018 05:34 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 22/08/2018 17:11, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 08/22/2018 01:03 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
That's interesting.
IMHO this quote is quite a half-full half-empty cup one:
* it mandates the set of
On 22/08/2018 17:48, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 08/22/2018 05:34 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 22/08/2018 17:11, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 08/22/2018 01:03 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
That's interesting.
IMHO this quote is quite a half-full half-empty cup one:
* it mandates the set of
On 08/22/2018 05:34 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 22/08/2018 17:11, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/22/2018 01:03 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
That's interesting.
> IMHO this quote is quite a half-full half-empty cup one:
> * it mandates the set of usage domains is a subset
On 08/22/2018 05:34 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 22/08/2018 17:11, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/22/2018 01:03 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
That's interesting.
> IMHO this quote is quite a half-full half-empty cup one:
> * it mandates the set of usage domains is a subset
On 22/08/2018 17:11, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 08/22/2018 01:03 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
That's interesting.
IMHO this quote is quite a half-full half-empty cup one:
* it mandates the set of usage domains is a subset of the set
of the control domains, but
* it speaks of independent
On 22/08/2018 17:11, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 08/22/2018 01:03 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
That's interesting.
IMHO this quote is quite a half-full half-empty cup one:
* it mandates the set of usage domains is a subset of the set
of the control domains, but
* it speaks of independent
On 08/22/2018 05:42 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 01:18:20 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
On 08/21/2018 07:07 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
This convention has been enforced by the kernel since v1. This is also
enforced by both the LPAR as well as in z/VM. The following is from the
PR/SM
On 08/22/2018 05:42 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 01:18:20 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
On 08/21/2018 07:07 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
This convention has been enforced by the kernel since v1. This is also
enforced by both the LPAR as well as in z/VM. The following is from the
PR/SM
On 08/22/2018 01:03 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> That's interesting.
>>
>>> IMHO this quote is quite a half-full half-empty cup one:
>>> * it mandates the set of usage domains is a subset of the set
>>> of the control domains, but
>>> * it speaks of independent controls, namely about the 'usage
On 08/22/2018 01:03 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> That's interesting.
>>
>>> IMHO this quote is quite a half-full half-empty cup one:
>>> * it mandates the set of usage domains is a subset of the set
>>> of the control domains, but
>>> * it speaks of independent controls, namely about the 'usage
On 08/21/2018 07:18 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On 08/21/2018 07:07 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/21/2018 11:25 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 13:41:32 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/20/2018 10:23 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:48:09 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/21/2018 07:18 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On 08/21/2018 07:07 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/21/2018 11:25 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 13:41:32 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/20/2018 10:23 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:48:09 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 22/08/2018 11:42, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 01:18:20 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
On 08/21/2018 07:07 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
This convention has been enforced by the kernel since v1. This is also
enforced by both the LPAR as well as in z/VM. The following is from the
PR/SM
On 22/08/2018 11:42, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 01:18:20 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
On 08/21/2018 07:07 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
This convention has been enforced by the kernel since v1. This is also
enforced by both the LPAR as well as in z/VM. The following is from the
PR/SM
On 08/22/2018 11:42 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 01:18:20 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
On 08/21/2018 07:07 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
This convention has been enforced by the kernel since v1. This is also
enforced by both the LPAR as well as in z/VM. The following is from the
On 08/22/2018 11:42 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 01:18:20 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
On 08/21/2018 07:07 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
This convention has been enforced by the kernel since v1. This is also
enforced by both the LPAR as well as in z/VM. The following is from the
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 01:18:20 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
> On 08/21/2018 07:07 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> > This convention has been enforced by the kernel since v1. This is also
> > enforced by both the LPAR as well as in z/VM. The following is from the
> > PR/SM Planning Guide:
> >
> > Control
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 01:18:20 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
> On 08/21/2018 07:07 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> > This convention has been enforced by the kernel since v1. This is also
> > enforced by both the LPAR as well as in z/VM. The following is from the
> > PR/SM Planning Guide:
> >
> > Control
On 08/21/2018 07:07 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/21/2018 11:25 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 13:41:32 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/20/2018 10:23 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:48:09 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
From: Tony Krowiak
Provides the sysfs
On 08/21/2018 07:07 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/21/2018 11:25 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 13:41:32 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/20/2018 10:23 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:48:09 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
From: Tony Krowiak
Provides the sysfs
On 08/21/2018 11:25 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 13:41:32 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/20/2018 10:23 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:48:09 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
From: Tony Krowiak
Provides the sysfs interfaces for:
1. Assigning AP control
On 08/21/2018 11:25 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 13:41:32 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 08/20/2018 10:23 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:48:09 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
From: Tony Krowiak
Provides the sysfs interfaces for:
1. Assigning AP control
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 13:41:32 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
> On 08/20/2018 10:23 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:48:09 -0400
> > Tony Krowiak wrote:
> >
> >> From: Tony Krowiak
> >>
> >> Provides the sysfs interfaces for:
> >>
> >> 1. Assigning AP control domains to the
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 13:41:32 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
> On 08/20/2018 10:23 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:48:09 -0400
> > Tony Krowiak wrote:
> >
> >> From: Tony Krowiak
> >>
> >> Provides the sysfs interfaces for:
> >>
> >> 1. Assigning AP control domains to the
On 08/20/2018 10:23 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:48:09 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
From: Tony Krowiak
Provides the sysfs interfaces for:
1. Assigning AP control domains to the mediated matrix device
2. Unassigning AP control domains from a mediated matrix device
3.
On 08/20/2018 10:23 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:48:09 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
From: Tony Krowiak
Provides the sysfs interfaces for:
1. Assigning AP control domains to the mediated matrix device
2. Unassigning AP control domains from a mediated matrix device
3.
On 08/20/2018 04:23 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:48:09 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
From: Tony Krowiak
Provides the sysfs interfaces for:
1. Assigning AP control domains to the mediated matrix device
2. Unassigning AP control domains from a mediated matrix device
3.
On 08/20/2018 04:23 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:48:09 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
From: Tony Krowiak
Provides the sysfs interfaces for:
1. Assigning AP control domains to the mediated matrix device
2. Unassigning AP control domains from a mediated matrix device
3.
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:48:09 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
> From: Tony Krowiak
>
> Provides the sysfs interfaces for:
>
> 1. Assigning AP control domains to the mediated matrix device
>
> 2. Unassigning AP control domains from a mediated matrix device
>
> 3. Displaying the control domains
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:48:09 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
> From: Tony Krowiak
>
> Provides the sysfs interfaces for:
>
> 1. Assigning AP control domains to the mediated matrix device
>
> 2. Unassigning AP control domains from a mediated matrix device
>
> 3. Displaying the control domains
From: Tony Krowiak
Provides the sysfs interfaces for:
1. Assigning AP control domains to the mediated matrix device
2. Unassigning AP control domains from a mediated matrix device
3. Displaying the control domains assigned to a mediated matrix
device
The IDs of the AP control domains
From: Tony Krowiak
Provides the sysfs interfaces for:
1. Assigning AP control domains to the mediated matrix device
2. Unassigning AP control domains from a mediated matrix device
3. Displaying the control domains assigned to a mediated matrix
device
The IDs of the AP control domains
60 matches
Mail list logo
