On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 05:21:24PM +, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
> On Sep 3, 2015, at 1:12 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:52:05PM +0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >> That is not a bad idea. Put this array in the data section of the
> >> VDSO too. It should be small enough
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 05:21:24PM +, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
> On Sep 3, 2015, at 1:12 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:52:05PM +0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >> That is not a bad idea. Put this array in the data section of the
> >> VDSO too.
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
> > On Sep 3, 2015, at 1:12 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:52:05PM +0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >> That is not a bad idea. Put this array in the data section of the
> >> VDSO too. It should be small enough though on systems
> On Sep 3, 2015, at 1:12 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:52:05PM +0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Siarhei Siamashka
>> wrote:
> [...]
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 01:58:56 +0800 pins...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Yes but I guess you talk
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:52:05PM +0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Siarhei Siamashka
> wrote:
[...]
> >> > On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 01:58:56 +0800 pins...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> >> Yes but I guess you talk about caching the value in userspace but doing
> >> >> it via the
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Siarhei Siamashka
wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 00:28:28 +
> "Pinski, Andrew" wrote:
>
>> > On Sep 2, 2015, at 3:13 AM, Siarhei Siamashka
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 01:58:56 +0800
>> > pins...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >
>> >>> On Sep 2, 2015, at 1:30
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 00:28:28 +
"Pinski, Andrew" wrote:
> > On Sep 2, 2015, at 3:13 AM, Siarhei Siamashka
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 01:58:56 +0800
> > pins...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >>> On Sep 2, 2015, at 1:30 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >>>
> >>> [...]
> >>>
> >>> On Sat,
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:52:05PM +0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Siarhei Siamashka
> wrote:
[...]
> >> > On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 01:58:56 +0800 pins...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> >> Yes but I guess you talk about caching the value in userspace
> On Sep 3, 2015, at 1:12 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:52:05PM +0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Siarhei Siamashka
>> wrote:
> [...]
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 01:58:56 +0800
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
> > On Sep 3, 2015, at 1:12 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:52:05PM +0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >> That is not a bad idea. Put this array in the data section of the
> >> VDSO too. It should be small
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 00:28:28 +
"Pinski, Andrew" wrote:
> > On Sep 2, 2015, at 3:13 AM, Siarhei Siamashka
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 01:58:56 +0800
> > pins...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >>> On Sep 2, 2015, at 1:30 AM,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Siarhei Siamashka
wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 00:28:28 +
> "Pinski, Andrew" wrote:
>
>> > On Sep 2, 2015, at 3:13 AM, Siarhei Siamashka
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed,
> On Sep 2, 2015, at 3:13 AM, Siarhei Siamashka
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 01:58:56 +0800
> pins...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>> On Sep 2, 2015, at 1:30 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 07:46:22PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> It is useful
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 01:58:56 +0800
pins...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Sep 2, 2015, at 1:30 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 07:46:22PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > It is useful to pass down MIDR register down to userland if all of
> > the online
> On Sep 2, 2015, at 1:19 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:51:44PM +0100, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 2, 2015, at 12:33 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 07:46:22PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
It is
> On Sep 2, 2015, at 1:30 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 07:46:22PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> It is useful to pass down MIDR register down to userland if all of
> the online cores are all the same type. This adds AT_ARM64_MIDR
> aux vector
[...]
> >>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 07:46:22PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >>> It is useful to pass down MIDR register down to userland if all of
> >>> the online cores are all the same type. This adds AT_ARM64_MIDR
> >>> aux vector type and passes down the midr system register.
> >>>
> >>>
> On Sep 2, 2015, at 12:51 AM, "pins...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Sep 2, 2015, at 12:33 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 07:46:22PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> It is useful to pass down MIDR register down to userland if all of
>>> the online
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:51:44PM +0100, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 2, 2015, at 12:33 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 07:46:22PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >> It is useful to pass down MIDR register down to userland if all of
> >>
> On Sep 2, 2015, at 12:33 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 07:46:22PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> It is useful to pass down MIDR register down to userland if all of
>> the online cores are all the same type. This adds AT_ARM64_MIDR
>> aux vector type and
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 07:46:22PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> It is useful to pass down MIDR register down to userland if all of
> the online cores are all the same type. This adds AT_ARM64_MIDR
> aux vector type and passes down the midr system register.
>
> This is alternative to
> On Sep 2, 2015, at 12:51 AM, "pins...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Sep 2, 2015, at 12:33 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 07:46:22PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> It is useful to pass down MIDR register
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 01:58:56 +0800
pins...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Sep 2, 2015, at 1:30 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 07:46:22PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > It is useful to pass down MIDR register down to userland if all
> On Sep 2, 2015, at 1:19 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:51:44PM +0100, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 2, 2015, at 12:33 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:51:44PM +0100, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 2, 2015, at 12:33 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 07:46:22PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >> It is useful to pass down MIDR register down to
[...]
> >>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 07:46:22PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >>> It is useful to pass down MIDR register down to userland if all of
> >>> the online cores are all the same type. This adds AT_ARM64_MIDR
> >>> aux vector type and passes down the midr system register.
> >>>
> >>>
> On Sep 2, 2015, at 1:30 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 07:46:22PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> It is useful to pass down MIDR register down to userland if all of
> the online cores are all the same type. This adds
> On Sep 2, 2015, at 3:13 AM, Siarhei Siamashka
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 01:58:56 +0800
> pins...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>> On Sep 2, 2015, at 1:30 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 07:46:22PM
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 07:46:22PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> It is useful to pass down MIDR register down to userland if all of
> the online cores are all the same type. This adds AT_ARM64_MIDR
> aux vector type and passes down the midr system register.
>
> This is alternative to
> On Sep 2, 2015, at 12:33 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 07:46:22PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> It is useful to pass down MIDR register down to userland if all of
>> the online cores are all the same type. This adds AT_ARM64_MIDR
>>
It is useful to pass down MIDR register down to userland if all of
the online cores are all the same type. This adds AT_ARM64_MIDR
aux vector type and passes down the midr system register.
This is alternative to MIDR_EL1 part of
It is useful to pass down MIDR register down to userland if all of
the online cores are all the same type. This adds AT_ARM64_MIDR
aux vector type and passes down the midr system register.
This is alternative to MIDR_EL1 part of
32 matches
Mail list logo